|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 02:36 AM Original message |
Toyota Demands ABC Retract Report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 02:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. Ooo, another post from that Toyota guy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 03:00 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Oh come on now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Deleted message |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
3. Ah the problems of rich assholes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chemisse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 03:43 AM Response to Original message |
4. I was really impressed with that ABC report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:13 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. The ONLY "fake" part was the tach shot - and only because they couldn't get a steady shot moving. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chemisse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 05:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Ahhh thank you. That certainly was misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. None of it was "faked". The OP is a single issue pro-Toyota poster. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. Another tactic by Toyota's defensive PR team |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. If they put a FRACTION what they spend on PR and discrediting victims into FIXING the damn problem, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
9. "Toyota used its 'game plan' to escape a major early recall (07)" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 12:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. We are unable to locate the page you requested. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Too late to edit. Here's a fixed link (same link is contained in the LBN thread.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
11. Toyota is focusing on retractions when they should be finding the solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 10:40 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. One thing is new though--this sense of disdain Toyota has for its customers--especially older ones! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeschutesRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 11:30 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I agree, and I didn't expect it from Toyota. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. Toyota Spokesman Bart Simpson reiterated Toyota's position: "We didn't do it!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-19-10 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
18. Toyota is being disingenuous, but the ABC report is based on a flawed scenario |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 20th 2025, 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC