|
However, the polls need to be sensibly interpreted. The questions, "Will you be more or less likely to vote for someone who voted for (or against) this bill" lead to many otherwise honest people lying. To see why, assume that a Republican President were at a similar point and the issue was privatizing social security. For many here, the probability of voting for a Republican would be extremely close, if not equal, to zero. Yet how many here would respond "less likely"? I would and when I posed this question to my husband, he would.
To really get at a truer measure, they could have first asked "do you now plan to vote for a Democrat or Republican for the House:. Then ask the question on health care. A good measure as this is close to a party line vote, would be to see how many who said Democrat, now say "less likely". "Republicans" saying more likely would similarly be interesting.
Given that all 4 numbers (more likely, less likely for either vote) are in the high twenties/low thirties, I think you are not seeing much other than partisans on either side. Thinking more, I think a "no" vote hurts a Democrat more. The reason for this is that the Republicans saying "more likely" will probably vote for the Republican to further stop the "Obama agenda", while the they could lose the Democrats, who responded less likely.
(Note I didn't speak of independents - but here, they would be the people who refused to say they were leaning to the Republican or Democrat, which is different than how they registered. That group might be the only one that could be taken at face value.
|