Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wachovia/Wells Fargo Pays $160 Million to Halt Drug Money Laundering Probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 11:46 AM
Original message
Wachovia/Wells Fargo Pays $160 Million to Halt Drug Money Laundering Probe
Wachovia/Wells Fargo Pays $160 Million to Halt Drug Money Laundering Probe


The U.S. Department of Justice has convinced Wachovia bank to pay the government $160 million for allowing its foreign exchange houses in Mexico to launder drug money.

Wachovia, now owned by Wells Fargo, admitted to permitting $110 million to be wired from the U.S. to south of the border from 2004-2007 to buy aircraft for drug cartels. But the laundering may have been even greater, according to the Drug Enforcement Administration, which claimed Wachovia failed to keep track of $420 billion in transactions by Mexican exchange houses.

The $160 million fine represents the biggest penalty ever imposed under the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to carefully track transactions to detect suspicious activity.

Jeffrey H. Sloman, the U.S. Attorney whose Southern District of Florida office led the investigation, said, "Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations by laundering at least $110 million in drug proceeds. Corporate citizens, no matter how big or powerful, must be held accountable for their actions."

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Wachovia_Wells_Fargo_Pays_160_Million_Dollars_to_Halt_Drug_Money_Laundering_Probe_100320
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. for them it is sort of like paying the traffic ticket so as not to have to show up in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornerBar Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. No problem ...just raise over draft fees to make up for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's why we have the war on drugs
so people who are not directly involved with the drug trade can make money with a clear conscience.

A 1% exchange fee on $420 billion? But laundering requires more transactions than that, each one generating a fee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC