Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

58 of the 59 Senators who were ready to pass a bill with MC Buy In before WH pressured Reid to cave

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:50 AM
Original message
58 of the 59 Senators who were ready to pass a bill with MC Buy In before WH pressured Reid to cave



....to Lieberman and drop the Medicare Buy In "because we only have 59 votes" are still in the Senate.


The only reason the Medicare Buy In was not in this bill is because of White House's deal with the for-profit hospital industry.


Grayson's bill is nice window dressing for gutless "progressives" to sign on as co-sponsors for a bill going nowhere so they can claim to favor a Medicare Buy In, to cover for their shameless complicity in passing a lobbyist written industry give-away.


The sad truth is that party I worked for does not have the guts to take on the cartel, but they have the gall to hand the middle class an unfunded mandate:


(43% of Americans will be ineligible for subsidies, more will be forced into the individual market, which the CBO says will experience an ACCELERATION in premium inflation, even as the CBO optimistically predicts group rates will continue to inflate at "only" the same astronomical rate, DESPITE the expansion in coverage and the resultant decline in uncompensated care)


Only with "customers" captive by a no-public-option mandate, with neither effective price controls nor competition, will corporate interests be able to continue the price gouging that was in past said to be due to the vast amount of uninsured, uncompensated care, but which even the CBO predicts to continue DESPITE EXPANSION (by mandate) OF COVERAGE, and a reduction in uncompensated care.


When I turned on C-SPAN yesterday and saw a California Democratic representative shamelessly talking as if this bill was "taking on" the insurance industry, I felt nothing but nausea.


The Republicans have kept their hands clean, but after the voter backlash, the Republicans will NEVER reverse the unfunded mandate on the middle class.


Never have we seen a better example of why the corporate interests need two "opposing parties" of whores.




:kick:





"If Barack Obama’s bill gets changed to exclude the public entities, it is not health insurance reform…it rises and falls on whether the public is allowed to choose Medicare if they’re under 65 or not. If they are allowed to choose Medicare as an option, this bill will be real health care reform...."

- Howard Dean







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, we could have gotten the public option by the whip count as well
But people are just worthless unless some parasite is making money off of our illness and pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shhhh! It's No Truth Day on DU
Haven't you heard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. You're spoiling the party!
You're supposed to do what any good politician would do. Get on board with something you know is wrong, but do it for the team. Everyone's doing it in DC. Even Howard Dean and Kucinich.

Excellent post as usual. I especially agree with your last two sentences.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's over guys. Deal with it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-22-10 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Should people not bother with trying to reform the reform, then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC