Can we at least celebrate this one liberal aspect of HCR
Cetacea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 07:27 AM
Original message |
Can we at least celebrate this one liberal aspect of HCR |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-22-10 08:05 AM by Cetacea
It provides the most help to those among us who have the least by expanding medicaid in a major way. And there will be no more "cuts to social programs" by republican governors.
And this is totally maddening to republicans...
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 08:01 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I am more than happy to celebrate that core liberal value |
|
as well as many of the other good things in this bill:party:
|
corpseratemedia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and what changed my mind about my wavering support - for us single payer supporters, I hope this is in some way an open door...
and when Orrin Hatch whinnies like a horse about "Europeanization," a. he forgets where he and his fellow baggers come from and b.GOOD.
|
Cetacea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Hopefully medicaid for the many will become medicaire for all |
|
Now that there is no hope of bipartisanship it may come to pass that leadership finishes the job in the next year or two...
|
eridani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message |
4. That did not require forcing mandates on everyone else. Medicaid is EXISTING legislation |
|
It requires no new legislation to expand it.
|
Cetacea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. It needed help and it's always on the short list for state cuts |
|
Medicaid is a skeleton of what it used to be. And it barely covers the poorest of the poor. It can't be simply "expanded" without us paying for it, whether it be through higher taxes or mandates. Shifting money from defense to medicaid is political suicide and would probably get us another decade of republicans in the white house.
|
eridani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-22-10 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yes, it did need help. But Medicaid is an already existing program |
|
If you hadn't noticed, we will be forced to pay higher taxes to subsidize private insurance. I'm not seeing the problem with just putting the extra money into Medicaid.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.