The Supreme Court is about to undergo another generational transition, as the senior leader of its liberal wing, John Paul Stevens, is expected to retire this summer and be replaced by a junior justice appointed by President Obama.
For the moment, the front-runners for the nomination, assuming Stevens does announce his retirement after he turns 90 next month, are said by legal insiders to be U.S. Solicitor Gen. Elena Kagan, 49; Judge Diane Wood, 59, of the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago; and Judge Merrick Garland, 57, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
They were all once law clerks at the Supreme Court for liberal justices, and they have ties to President Clinton. Wood and Garland were Clinton appointees; Kagan worked in the Clinton White House.
None of them would probably change the ideological balance on the court. But neither would any of them quite replace Stevens, simply because of his experience, his gentle persuasiveness and, particularly, his key position as the senior justice on the court's liberal side for the last 16 years...
"Before and after Justice Stevens, it was often the case that if a 'liberal' result is possible, it is because Justice Kennedy is leaning that way," said Walter Dellinger, solicitor general under President Clinton.
"But after Stevens, Justice Kennedy will be the senior justice in almost any liberal majority, and he will assign the opinion to himself or another justice. It may even, at the margin, influence how he votes."
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-court-stevens22-2010mar22,0,563537.story