Granted, they're similar in many important ways:
The John Birch Society is a radical right-wing,Americentric political advocacy group that supports anti-communism, limited government, and personal freedom. It has been described as "ultraconservative", "far right", and "extremist".
...The society says it is anti-totalitarian, particularly anti-socialist and anti-communist. It seeks to limit the powers of government and defends the original intention of the U.S. Constitution, based on Judeo-Christian principles. It opposes collectivism, including wealth redistribution, economic interventionism, socialism, communism, and fascism. In a 1983 edition of Crossfire, Congressman Larry McDonald (D-Georgia), then its newly appointed president, characterized the society as belonging to the Old Right rather than the New Right (he defined New Right as "Viguerie and post-Viguerie").
The society opposed aspects of the civil rights movement in the 1960s because of its concerns that the movement had communists in important positions. The society opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, saying it was in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and overstepped the rights of individual states to enact laws regarding civil rights. The society is against "one world government", and has an immigration reduction view on immigration reform. It opposes the United Nations, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), and other free trade agreements. The society argues that there is a devaluing of the U.S. Constitution in favor of political and economic globalization, and that this trend is not an accident. It cites David Rockefeller's 2002 autobiography Memoirs, in which he wrote, "Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
The Southern Poverty Law Center, an advocacy group which monitors various political groups, lists the society as a "Patriot' Group". It defines such a group as follows: "Generally, Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the 'New World Order' or advocate or adhere to extreme antigovernment doctrines".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Birch_SocietyPretty bad, isn't it? But wait! Even the John Birch society isn't as bad as the TeaFreaks!
Antisemitic, racist, anti-Mormon, anti-Masonic, and religious groups criticized the group's acceptance of Jews, non-whites, Masons, and Mormons.These people need to be presented to the American public not as 'concerned citizens' but as
more extreme, more violent and more radical than the John Birch Society.