|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:35 PM Original message |
What the rich will pay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow, an additional $7,000 on an income of $1,000,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You laugh, but you've illustrated the point perfectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. But they think it's too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah, and the way it is now is soooo much better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:46 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. No, Im saying its too little |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 10:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Oh FFS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 10:57 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. So its too much as far as you're concerned? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 09:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Now all we got to do is sneak a Social Security fix like this past em/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samplegirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
8. Those poor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-22-10 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
9. Miniscule measure, but at least it's in the right direction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
12. Less than "peanuts". Anyone who objects to such a trivial expense is a sicko. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC