|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 01:52 AM Original message |
Overheard today at my small family local produce store |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 01:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. What a powerful message! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cicada (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
2. subsidies for small employers begin immediately - 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Thanks for the link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 02:03 AM Response to Original message |
3. Ummm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:06 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Right now there is no limit on how much an insurer can charge to a small group |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:08 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. And now that insurers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. They can charge more based on age but not health. And the gap between the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. if they can charge more for age, seems an incentive for employers not to hire older people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:27 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. That's already the case. With the new law, the disparity between the cheapest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:32 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. how so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. By law. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:48 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. no, in what sense does it narrow the gap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:31 AM Original message |
It's absolute age discrimination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
15. Congress has REDUCED the age discrimination. The difference is much greater now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 11:32 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Well, whoop-de-freaking-do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. I think it's unrealistic to not recognize that older people are more subject to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 12:25 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Just as its unrealistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
5. If he had even one employee with a preexisting condition, that could have meant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:16 AM Response to Reply #5 |
9. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Not true. They will be limited in the differential they can charge policy holders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 11:34 AM Response to Reply #12 |
21. plus the grocer gets tax breaks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
notesdev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 03:54 AM Response to Original message |
17. He'd better keep praying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 04:56 AM Response to Original message |
18. Does't this bill give a sort of discount to small business so they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-23-10 05:02 AM Response to Original message |
19. How can this be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC