|
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 07:39 PM by Still Sensible
they'll try and walk a tightrope. They can't afford to distance themselves from the teabaggers in a public way because they need every knuckle dragger to donate money and show up at the polls. I suspect they will do nothing to rein them in (unless events force them to). I don't think you'll see a great deal of public support from mainstream GOP, they just won't dare call them out.
The media covers the teabaggers as if they are a bigger force and more legitimate than they are. When I was a kid we had the birchers and the survivalists and the klanners--who were all treated as the fringe groups they were... but thanks to the mass media and the internet the flat-earth-bigots-have-to-make-sure-people-different-from-us-don't-get-anything is still fringe, but a bigger group than they used to be. They get to meet up in chat rooms now and reinforce themselves. Not to mention recruit vulnerable potential knuckle draggers.
While I believe that the USSC--even the bunch we have now--would be very unlikely to overturn 200 years of the interpretation of the supremacy clause, you can bet they;ll go shopping for favorable conservative districts in which they could win the first round. Heck, it's a longshot, but if they can get it in the eight circuit they could win round two as well.
One difference, given that in a short time the insurance companies will (they should) embrace the current bill, the judicial efforts may not be s well financed. I refuse to believe that the income to the insurance companies from the addition of 30 million mostly healthy new premium payers doesn't outweigh the losses those companies fear from the limits removal and inability to deny coverage provisions.
Anyway, the moderate wing of the GOP that ruled the party until Reagan, would have publicly backed away from these clowns--as they did the birchers and their ilk in the 60s and 70s... But the current Repuke Party will walk the tightrope IMO.
Corrected spelling.
|