|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:43 PM Original message |
UK Airport worker oogles colleague in naked airport body scanner machine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
1. NOBODY could have foreseen this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. I'm shocked! Who would have thought this would happen?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
16. Yeah, who would'a thunk it? Might be interesting should images of a few VIPs, be it government, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tranche (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. "horrified when Laker pressed a button" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. What's with this press the button crap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
immoderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. It's called "video memory." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Not really. Design it such that each image is stored in a specific memory location |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 05:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Yeah, it's be nice if the software in those scanners were designed that way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. Even apart from privacy issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Hope you enjoy the manual body cavity search then. Good Lord I hate these bastards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. manual body cavity search WTF. the scanners dont do a cavaity search. all one has to do is insert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. It's not really for detection. It's for making people afraid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. to dehumanize and criminalize as a whole. to have us all two steppin together, head down, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
6. Thanks John Laker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'm not condoning her coworker's actions, but I'd like to know how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:06 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Here is what one of them looks like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. In that case, I guess it could have happened like she said. I had seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
23. That's FAKED. The photo doesn't match the man's pose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmoney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. well, the scan could be from a few seconds earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. What about this one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ManiacJoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. That one is also faked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
10. This thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. ya. and as once again a womans right to privacy and decency is invaded, we woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. I wondered where Larry Craig went to work... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
18. "oogles"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. 'ogles', not a double o |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Ah, the irony of The Sun calling the guard 'pervy', when it publishes topless photos every day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
24. Now that Taliban plastic surgeons are out there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmoney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
25. What happened to the screen being in a different room from the scanner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
951-Riverside (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:53 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. They lied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Winterblues (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. What would God think about people seeing others naked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. so how others may feel doesnt matter. since you are not opposed to getting naked for all. about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
29. Oh dear.. that's just terrible.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Soylent Brice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
30. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
34. I TOLD YOU SO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
36. The photos of scans I've seen are visibly retouched to "white-out" nipples and genitals.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 06:09 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Hey, I go to Colorado State! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-24-10 06:27 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Yes she is -- I admire her work very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Festivito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-25-10 05:31 AM Response to Original message |
39. But the politically connected seller made lots of MONEY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC