Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Several posts I've read in various threads convince me that the violent right are TERRORISTS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kievan Rus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:29 PM
Original message
Several posts I've read in various threads convince me that the violent right are TERRORISTS
A common definition for terrorism is the politically motivated use of violence, or the fear of the use of violence, with the intent of violently coercing certain political or social changes, or changes in behavior.

In several threads, people have posted that they are afraid to put Democratic or liberal signs on their lawns, or said bumper stickers on their cars, for fear of violent incidents from wingnuts. One poster mentioned that up in Canada during a recent election cycle, due to the influence of the Glenn Becks of the world, that cars parked at houses with liberal signage had brake lines cut. There have been a rash of violent attacks from wingnuts in the recent past; and the shooting at the Knoxville church and the assassination of Dr. Tiller would be clearly seen as an attempt to inspire fear in those that are anything other than racist, homophobic wingnuts. The incident with the cut gas lines at the brother of a pro-HCR Congressman in Virginia is another despicable act of terrorist violence. If all of what I have just listed isn't terrorism, then quite frankly, I don't know what is.

It's no different than what has been witnessed throughout history and even today in other parts of the world. In Northern Ireland during the Troubles, both average Joe Catholics and average Joe Protestants were fearful of openly displaying allegiances for fear of violence from the PIRA or UVF (depending on whether they were Catholic or Protestant). In Afghanistan and Pakistan, women are afraid to go without the veil for fear of being attacked by the Taliban and other radical Jihadists.

I've said it once and I will say it again; the only difference between the wingnuts at al-Qaeda is eight thousand miles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is a feature of right-brained individuals,
anywhere in the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think government officials need to start using the term "domestic terrorist" - maybe...
...have some FBI reps on the air talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mariawr Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. The 'shooter' meme is intentional and designed to echon in
the RRwingers heads..like in-your-face subliminal messaging.
Make no mistake, ytou know how the g-no-p and Faux Arabia Noise work--tell a lie often and a lot=the truth.
This is intentional and terroristic ---anarchic-- in nature.


Country first my @$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. If not domestic terrorist it seems damn close to it! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Patriot Act definition of 'Domestic Terrorism':
A person engages in domestic terrorism if they do an act ""dangerous to human life"" that is a violation of the criminal laws of a state or the United States, if the act appears to be intended to:

(i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.


----

It's a very broad definition and so teabaggers are walking right on the borderline and some have fallen over.

Also the civil asset forfeiture power of the United States government is awesome. The government can seize and/or freeze the assets on the mere assertion that there is probable cause to believe that the assets were involved in domestic terrorism. The assets are seized before a person is given a hearing, and often without notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC