Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rude Pundit - Bill Donohue: Leave the Child Fuckers Alone

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:17 AM
Original message
The Rude Pundit - Bill Donohue: Leave the Child Fuckers Alone
As always, the most hilarious remarks about anything where someone whispers a single mean word about the religion known as Catholicism comes from Bill Donohue of the Catholic League (motto: "We write press releases by the thousands"). Catholicism, in case you don't know, is a large sect of the Christian faith where practitioners engage in mock cannibalism and vampirism as a way of ingesting bits of their god. One presumes that eventually they must shit out the flesh of Christ and piss out his blood but that it leaves behind some magical residue. (And does that mean the toilet is now blessed? So many questions.)

Oh, and a large number of their priests were able to rape children without going to jail. In fact, because the Catholic leadership saw boy-fucking as more of a social faux pas than a crime where people ought to be sent to prison, cardinals and abbots and costellos and whatever the fuck they have all conspired to cover-up crimes that involved, in various cases, dozens, if not hundreds of victims per rapist. And now that it's been demonstrated that the leader of the whole goddamn religion, a Pope who was once a Nazi, knew that an American priest was fucking deaf kids and refused to stop him, one would think that Catholics would be having one of those soul-searching, "Ah, fuck, can we end this denial?" moments.

Not Bill Donohue. That corn-toothed, fat headed motherfucker has put out statement after statement, screaming that everyone should just back off. On last week, just as it was revealed that Pope Benedict participated in the conspiracy to hide the child fucking, Donohue wrote in his bizarro screed, "Employers from every walk of life, in both the U.S. and Europe, have long handled cases of alleged sex abuse by employees as an internal matter. Rarely have employers called the cops, and none was required to do so." Now, remember: we're not talking about a secretary's ass slap. We're talking about a priest shoving his dick into the mouth or ass of preteen boys.

This qualitative difference does not matter to Donohue. In fact, Donohue's entire defense of the Catholic Church rests on a few assumptions and comparisons that can only be described as "fucking mad." See, Donohue says, 30 years ago, we just let the child fuckers go free. And, hey, liberals, all of you say that molesters should get therapy and be rehabilitated, so "Had the Catholic Church simply tossed the offenders out, it would have been branded as heartless." Um, no. We think that people who fuck kids should go to jail and that they should get rehabilitated there. In fact, if you don't go to jail after fucking 200 children, it's called "Getting away with it."

The other comparison that Donohue makes endlessly is that the media is overhyping this while not reporting on all the molesting rabbis. "Just this month, Rabbi Baruch Lebovits was found guilty on eight counts of sexually abusing a Brooklyn boy. Yet the Times, which has run several stories on the decades-old cases in Ireland and Germany, never reported it." Does it need to be explained that one case involves a man who committed a crime and went to prison for it and the other is about a decades-long conspiracy among church leaders to keep silent about thousands of cases of child fucking? Which is the newsworthier?

It's not that Donohue is just factually wrong about so much. It's that he's proudly wrong: "Let's say Archbishop Joseph Ratzinger, now the pope, did in fact learn of the transfer (of the child fucking German priest). So what? Wasn't that what he expected to happen?" Actually, what he should have expected is that Peter Hullerman would have the cops called on him and that he would be behind bars, like, you know, that rabbi he just mentioned.

But, hey, that's those wacky Catholics and their "beliefs" in "things." Besides, who needs to mock Donohue when he does such a good job on his own. As he writes, "It's a lot sexier to nail the Catholic Church."

Add "in," and he's pretty much got it.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bill Donohue is one crazy motherfucker.
His biggest delusion is that he speaks for American Catholics in any way. :crazy:

To watch him defend those who knowingly allowed/facilitated the molestation of innocent children is beyond disgusting -- his is the face of true evil. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. he also likes to blame the victims.
why does the media keep having this shit give interviews? for the shock value?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. 'Cause you KNOW those little boys were just begging for it.
Spin, spin, spin. It's what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes Bill, the little boys dressed provocatively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. ask all the teachers who've ever been caught molesting a student
and who've been sent to jail whether they would have preferred a nice internal investigation and repeated transfers to rural school system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. I take exception to one small part of this entry...
"Catholicism, in case you don't know, is a large sect of the Christian faith where practitioners engage in mock cannibalism and vampirism as a way of ingesting bits of their god"

This is inaccurate.

What OTHER Christians do with bread and wine might be considered "mock" cannibalism and vampirism, but in the Catholic sense there's nothing "mock" about it. According to official doctrine, the wafer and wine actually transubstiates into the REAL body and blood of Jesus, which Catholics then consume.

So, in fairness, Catholics engage in TRUE cannibalism and vamprirism as a part of their weekly rituals. At least, that's how they see it (and as an ex-Catholic, that's exactly what I was taught).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. No it's mock cannibalism and vampirism
because 'Jesus' never existed and wine and crackers are still wine and crackers even after mumbling over them.

It's just another farcical ceremony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveinJapan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Fair enough. I feel the same way. HOWEVER
it's important to illustrate just exactly how far they take their "beliefs", just as with Mormons and their Magical Underwear and delusions of becoming deities one day.

It's part of what makes the "rank and file" Catholic so very devout (that, plus the fear of eternal damnation), and thus unable to stand up against clearly evil actions by their spiritual leaders.

Just sayin...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bill Donahue is arguing that employers aren't required to report child rape?
I beg to differ. I've never known a non-church employer who WOULDN'T go to prison for keeping such a thing a secret if they were found out. They'd probably be charged as an accessory after the fact at the very least, and forbidden from ever having contact with children again. I suspect that last part is why they really, really, REALLY don't want the cops involved. And their constant pathetic attempts to blame gay people are just sad. They of ALL people should realize that until you stop trying to blame someone else for the things you do wrong, you can never achieve legitimate repentance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. Most excellent post.
Thank you. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC