Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South Carolina Lt Governor Andre Bauer Calling for a Constitutional Convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:27 PM
Original message
South Carolina Lt Governor Andre Bauer Calling for a Constitutional Convention
Health Care Reform Rift Inspires Call for Constitutional Convention
Tuesday, March 30, 2010


GRETA VAN SUSTEREN: Tea Party activists are not the only ones fired up, South Carolina Lieutenant Governor Andre Bauer announcing he is calling for a constitutional convention. Why? Well, let's ask him. Lieutenant Governor Bauer joins us live. Good evening, sir.

ANDRE BAUER, SOUTH CAROLINA LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR: Good evening.

~snip~

VAN SUSTEREN: I said you're calling for a constitutional convention, so tell me why and how you're doing that.

BAUER: Well, we -- the people I talk to in South Carolina feel like the administration is running roughshod over individual rights and personal liberties that Americans have come to expect, and we want them back, quite frankly.

~snip~

BAUER: Well, I've actually been calling legislators throughout the country, talked to several lieutenant governors, and I've mailed letters out to the vast majority of legislatures throughout the United States, asking them to join us. It would it take 34 states to actually have a constitutional convention, and 38 states to ratify it if we move forward in doing so.

VAN SUSTEREN: Has any state or any other lieutenant governor or governor or even attorney general said, Look, sign me up?

BAUER: I actually talked to David Dewhurst in Texas yesterday. He was excited about it. Talked to Peter Kinder two days ago out in Missouri. He was excited about it. So the more people I talk to about it, they are going to go and talk to their legislature, as well. So we are moving forward. We only started work on this at the end of last week, getting our legislative counsel to go ahead and start drafting the convention. And so we're moving forward with this, and the momentum is growing.

VAN SUSTEREN: What is the likelihood that you get your state's legislature to go along with this?

BAUER: Well, I think people know in South Carolina -- we're extremely conservative, and we realize that we have now watched what the federal government has done and we've moved towards socialism. And people are scared. They don't want it. We know that only 20 percent of the entire country wants it. So I feel very confident it'll pass in South Carolina and many other states, as well.

~snip~

VAN SUSTEREN: I understand -- I understand your passion for it, but do you not agree that 34 states is an awful lot of states to try to collect?

BAUER: Sure, it is. But this is a battle that -- I sure don't want to give up on this battle. What we're losing is one sixth of the economy was socialized last week! I mean, this is a battle -- I can't think of a battle more important than stopping what's happening in Washington right now.

~snip~
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,590083,00.html

apologies for the source :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. "individual rights and personal liberties that Americans have come to expect"
Do they ever actually spell out what these alleged rights are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. No never. Overheated rhetoric works best if you stick to broad generalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I guess they mean "our freedom to win every election"
effing crybabies, every one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice way to say revolution
That is what the right is pushing for. Rebellion, revolution, anything to undermine the elected government and regain control.

They are irresponsible losers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. He probably misses the three-fifths rule. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. What a fucking idiot. When Bush et al were REALLY trampling on our rights,
these nimrods didn't say a fucking word. Now they have their panties in a twist because a black man is President.

And yes, I would like to know exactly WHICH rights are being 'trampled on'.

Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I Agree With You FUCK HIM
Patriot Act: Okay
Warantless Wiretaps: Okay
Torture: Okay
Free Speech Zones: Okay


Health Care Reform = Violation of our individual rights and freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. just secede again, fuckers. then you won't get federal money
and we all know how the south loooooves to suck from the federal teat, all the while crying about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They'd get federal money, just not in the way they like
Kinda like what happened last time, anyway. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. What exactly does a ConCon do?
Completely rewrite the US Constitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. At the risk of using an old punchline, it does anything it wants to.
When Constitutional Conventions meet, the rules can go out the window. It was the fear of exactly this in 1788 the convinced Madison and Washington to reverse positions and come out in favor of adding a Bill of Rights to the Constitution. They're really powerful. A convention could decided its own method of ratification--say a simple majority plebiscite by 3/5s of the states--and that would be legally valid.

The way the 1787 Constitution was ratified, created its own novel, unprecedented standard for ratification and got away with it. Baggers could do the same. I doubt they'd ever pull it off, but there is that potential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Do Tea Baggers really support this?
I remember hearing about a CC about 10 years ago. Someone had said not to worry, because the far left and far right both oppose a ConCon. Reason being: Both sides fear the other side will influence it. I guess times have changed. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. It can amend the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. What's the matter with South Carolina? (Rhetorical question). nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deja fucking Vu.
Last time SC did something like this, we had a Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. So he wants to dismantle the US over the idea that everyone should get access to health care?
Why not go after the health insurance companies themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. everyone has to buy from private insurance companies . . .
and that's socialism?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where was this idiot when the Patriot Act was enacted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. I really loved his work on "Homicide: Life on the Streets", but this stuff just seems flaky.
Guess what they say about actors-turned-politicians is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. That was Braugher who would never say silly stuff like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Sanford's a freaking prize compared to Bauer.
That's why there hasn't been a big push for Sanford to resign, the Lt Gov is a whack job (so says my conservative friend in SC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CurtEastPoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Miss Andre needs to be OUTED and soon. That'll put and end to it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. the nation's health care turned over to private insurance companies
is socialism?

jezuz, these people are dumb

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalYoKel Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. "alleged rights"
"Do they ever actually spell out what these alleged rights are?"

Thank the lord Gouverneur Morris of Pennsylvania was nice enough to write them down for us. Then there is those pesky "additions" to them later. I thought liberals were for freedom and individual rights??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. sadly, over the years I've seen a few DUers make this same suggestion
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 05:02 PM by onenote
but fortunately, most DUers recognize what a horrible idea it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC