Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hightower on court ruling to disclose bailout details.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:16 PM
Original message
Hightower on court ruling to disclose bailout details.
by Jim Hightower.

In the bipartisan bailout of Wall Street banksters, our own government not only failed to stand up for us taxpayers, it aggressively stonewalled us so we couldn't even know which giant banks were getting how much of our money.

Thank goodness, then, for the news services and federal judges who're finally compelling this cabal of bankers and regulators to tell us what they did with our public funds. In a unanimous decision, three Court of appeals judges say that the Federal Reserve (which, by the way, was the regulator that was supposed to be in charge of preventing such Wall Street collapses) must now disclose who got $2 trillion in sweetheart loans that the Fed doled out to its teetering bank buddies in 2008.

Astonishingly, top Fed officials had claimed in court that this information constitutes "trade secrets," and that disclosure of names would cause "severe and irreparable" harm to these giants. Who is the Fed fronting for? A bank consortium that includes Bank of America, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, US Bancorp, and Wells Fargo.

The Wall Street powers moan that mere mention of the fact that they had liquidity problems that needed to be plugged with two trillion taxpayer dollars would "stigmatize them." One Wall Streeter even called such revelations a "death sentence" for the giants, adding that disclosure of names would be cruelly punitive: "I don't see what public purpose is served by it," he huffed.

Hello... bankers: It's our money! We The People have a right to know who failed and who we bailed out. This just shows, once again, that we consumers cannot trust the Fed, for it will always serve banker interests – not ours. Instead of giving it more consumer authority, as some in Congress are proposing, all of its watchdog powers should go to a totally-independent consumer agency located outside the Fed.

###

We're supposed to go on and let them swindle a nation, indefinitely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right on, Jim!
I love this man! Him, Ann Richards, and Molly Ivins were the best things that ever came out of Texas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Like a rose bush growing out of a cowpie. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan 04th 2025, 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC