Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you consider yourself a socialist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:12 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you consider yourself a socialist?
Or would you describe yourself as a socialist (assuming the stigma, if you perceive one, against socialism didn't exist).

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I consider myself a Social Democrat..nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. +1 Democratic Socialist here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Totally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. I like public education, public transportation, sidewalks, and
stuff like that.

So yep, I reckon I'm a socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. You'll have to define it, but I'll vote "somewhat". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. I think any definition I gave would start an argument over the definition
So chose not to.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comrade snarky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. You know this place pretty well don't you?
:evilgrin:

Me? I'm a somewhat socialist. None of the systems work in a pure form.

Except communism... in groups of about 60 or less. When they're poor already, and completely self sufficient. Then it's great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Democratic socialist or social democrat, yes.
Not International-Socialist/Marxist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nope. I prefer private control of the means of production. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. DSA-USA member...
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 08:28 AM by Davis_X_Machina
from its Michael Harrington/Irving Howe days.

Democratic Socialists of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes. Socialism and Capitalism can co-exist very well
Guaranteed care of all citizens' basic needs with the freedom to make your wealth above and beyond that. It would free up a lot of talent. People could be artists, writers, musicians or anything they truly want to be without getting caught up in the rat race and slavery of survival.

Basic care is the right to have an education, good housing, good medical care and nutritious food.

Totally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Agree, but I voted "not really"
capitalism and socialism are just tools, in some areas one works better than the other, in some areas a mixture of the two works best.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. BTW some thoughts on the distinction
This being DU I hope I can assume everybody knows what socialism is.

Maybe though a bit of discussion on what the absenec of socialism is NOT would help.

People who are not socialists, me included, do NOT necessarily (they may of course in some cases, but hardly likely many on DU) reject anyrole for government in providing infrastructure or services
(Personal POV - "common goods" where individual allocation of cost and benefit would be inefficient must always remain government funded. Infrastructure for public use, emergency services, defense, environmental control, basic research, education, healthcare (US excepted only in fact not theory) etc. Plenty of other things can and even should be government funded of course.

It is not socialism to advocate government spending for the public good. It is only socialism to advocate government control of industrial output regardless of whether it is used for the public good or merely commercial purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptical cynic Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Democratic Socialist
The Few benefit from socializing their losses, so why shouldn't the Many benefit from socializing their profits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
12. I guess somewhat
As I support a mixed free market economy that has good social practices in place as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes and no.
I strongly believe that individuals should be able to exchange their goods and services in a free market as the basis of the economy. I use the term "free" loosely here because I believe in reasonable regulation to protect consumers, workers and the environment. But I would like to see us socialize things that are too important for profit to be the main motive, like schools, health care, drinking water, etc. Things that people cannot live without, things that would dramatically disrupt our very way of life if they were inaccessible. This provides a safety net and then we can leave the rest to capitalism. I'll sell you my gizmo and you sell me your gizmo, etc. etc. etc. but none of us has to go without health care because some speculators on Wall Street jacks the price of gizmos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. Given that term "socialism" is widely used for diverse economic models it might help to define it.
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 08:51 AM by Statistical
Socialism is not a rigid philosophy. Economic models with varying amounts of freem-arket vs state driven economy would all be considered socialism. On one end of spectrum you have free (although tighly regulated) markets and capitalism with social interventions (economic/social safety net). At the other extreme you have centrally planned economies and/or state ownership (nationalization) of key industries.

I voted Somewhat because I do not advocate an elimination of capitalism. I would consider myself more of a Western European Socialist (capitalist + strong regulatory structure + progressive taxation + strong social safetynet).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. I voted the same way for much the same reason.
Very few people actually know the meaning of socialism.

Capitalism means investment money comes from private sources.
Socialism means investment money comes from society, from the government.
So technically, every economic stimulus bill is socialism.

I think there are far too many purists when it comes to capitalism, and that's because there is a confusion between capitalism and free enterprise. Socialism does not prevent free enterprise. It merely provides capital from the commons. You can have socialist free enterprise; they have it all over Europe. Free enterprise and capitalism go hand in hand, but aren't quite the same thing.

Then there's "sharing the wealth;" some define socialism as government entitlements like education and social security. Not quite socialism; that's social justice, a different concept entirely. The opposite of social justice is social Darwinism. So many people who oppose on principle government entitlements call themselves "capitalists" in an effort to define themselves opposite from what they hate.

I believe capitalism works. I believe some small element of socialism is a good idea, also. I believe in social justice, the idea of extending opportunity to those whose opportunities have been limited. I don't believe in social justice to the extent of unlimited welfare; I don't believe in handouts but I do believe in extending opportunities. Do these beliefs make me a socialist? It depends on how you define socialism. My definition is above, and based on it, I answered "somewhat."

I see no reason I can't call myself a capitalist and still believe government can, and should, invest in infrastructure of all kinds. There's no need, and no room, for ideological purity in pragmatic government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. I agree with all of that. Health Care is one good example.
Capitalism is the best vehicle for a product where prior to deliver nobody realized a market existed. Example would be ipod or cellphones. Trying to use socialism and Democratic process to bring innovation to the people is not a very good fit.

Health care (and fire department, Police protection, court systems, military) on the other hand are services that do not fit capitalist model very well. We keep trying and it just keeps costing more and more and more.

Sometimes Capitalism is the best "vehicle" to get the product/service/technology/innovation to the people. There are other times where Socialism is far better vehicle. Hybrid economies tend to be the most productive. Being a purist can be fun but pure ideologies rarely work in real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Not quite. I value capitalism...
...but realize that it needs strong regulation, plus a social safety net, to last.

Capitalism without socialism is untenable. And vice-versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. it all boils down to one question
why do we have a society/nation?
every man for himself has not worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
21. Reminder to take the Political Compass test to see where you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
22. Do you mean socialist in the original meaning of state ownership of the means of production OR in
the modern sense of a welfare state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. See above - defining it would create more issues I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Without a definition the only logical answer is "This is a bullshit poll!". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. I Like John Lennon's Definition
When asked if he was a socialist Lennon replied that "if socialism means that granny should get her teeth fixed than I'm a socialist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. I Like John Lennon's Definition
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 10:03 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
When asked if he was a socialist Lennon replied that "if socialism means that granny should get her teeth fixed then I'm a socialist".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Johhny applied poetry to the political
That really bothers people, making it all simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
socialist_n_TN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. I voted definitely yes, but....................
I think that that's because the definition of "socialism" is pretty squishy nowdays. In a European country I'd probably be considered pretty centrist.

I've always thought of myself as a small "s" socialist. IOW, I don't belong to any official socialist party, but I have strong socialistic type views. I believe that a freely elected government is the ONLY entity that is big enough and strong enough to provide a check on unregulated capitalism. Every time we've had unregulated capitalism in this country (or anywhere for that matter), it's been a fuckin' DISASTER for average people. How can it NOT be a overall disaster? It's based on greed and greed is one of the MOST negative traits in humanity. Since I'm not a rich corporatist, I consider myself an average person and I want that government control over greed.

I would actually go farther and say that any business that grows beyond a certain size (TBD) and takes a major market share needs pretty heavy regulation and taxation for the benefit of ALL the people of the nation. If you kept the amount of "too big to fail" at a reasonably large amount, you wouldn't stifle free market innovation, but you would have some control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. do we all agree on a definition of 'socialist'?
This was the first step in the class on socialism, and there were/are a variety of definitions. To some it is about collective ownership of the means of production. To me, it was, and is, more about a social spirit. A spirit of sharing and cooperation and compassion. As long as that spirit is there, then things like equality and collective ownership are irrelevant, and if that spirit is not there, then collective ownership really will not accomplish much.

Another issue is about a purpose of life. Our society's purpose is given as materialistic. Everybody wants more stuff, and cooler stuff and nicer stuff and to go lots of places and do lots of things. That is kinda unrelated to community spirit, but it is also kinda tied in. Because with a materialistic orientation, then most people generally are not important. Stuff is important, and my friends are important insofar as they entertain and protect me, but 98% of the rest of the world is not important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
32. To the FUCKING bone. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenMetalFlake Donating Member (102 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
33. Like, totally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
34. No. One wonders why we allow "them" to define "us" over and over
again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. I'm interested in pragmatic policies and politics, not ideological labels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
36. Hell no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. I believe in public tooods, which are socialist
However, not everything is or should be a public good. Governments should stay out of the restaurant business and suchlike; for profit businesses should not run fire departments and libraries and things of that nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc 4 Biden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. Courtesy of Upton Sinclair...
The American People will take Socialism, but they won't take the label. I certainly proved it in the case of EPIC. Running on the Socialist ticket I got 60,000 votes, and running on the slogan to "End Poverty in California" I got 879,000. I think we simply have to recognize the fact that our enemies have succeeded in spreading the Big Lie. There is no use attacking it by a front attack, it is much better to out-flank them.

Letter to Norman Thomas (25 September 1951)

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Upton_Sinclair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_bryanto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Good quote n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
39. Non-posting voters.
Tells the tale of why so many are so nervous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
40. If you drive on a publicly-funded freeway, you are a socialist.
If you get your food from a Grocery Store where deliveries were made on a publicly-funded road, you are a socialist.

If you participate in an economy that is dependent upon publicly-funded Interstate Freeway System, you are a socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
41. Hell Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
43. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
44. Not Really. I Believe the State Should Cover Basic Societal Needs
such as fire fighting, law enforcement, health care, and programs for the poor. I don't think the addition of health care to the other things paid for by taxation (which NOBODY ever complains about - when was the last time you heard any reasonable person complain about taxes paying for the fire department?) makes me a "socialist". Other than those basic services, I have no problem with capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
45. Heaven yes! I want consumers to boycott mean companies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shotten99 Donating Member (478 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. I also hate consumerism, but....
own an expensive car, mobile phone, clothes..blah blah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
47. "Capitalism" is only great for non-essential consumer goods, "socialism" should govern
the necessities of life, like public transit, energy production, health-care funding, education, basic nutrition, law enforcement, fire protection, maintenance of infrastructure, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. That's a great compromise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
48. It's the only true position a progressive should hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC