http://www.salon.com/news/michael_steele/index.html?story=/politics/war_room/2010/04/01/steele_rncSince almost immediately after he was elected to his position, Steele has been on a job deathwatch. He’s attacked Rush Limbaugh, committed multiple gaffes in public and second-guessed the GOP’s electoral chances. He criticized his own party in his book, which he hadn’t told anyone he was writing, and traveled around the country giving paid speeches -- a totally inappropriate activity for a party chairman. There have also been continuous problems with his management of the staff of the RNC. Most recently, he's gotten in hot water for the party thrown on the RNC's dime at a southern California bondage-themed nightclub.
Although Steele has already caught flak for his fundraising, things are about to get worse. In light of the recent embarrassment, conservatives of various stripes may seek to cut the RNC out of the process entirely. Tony Perkins, head of the Family Research Council, is urging Christian conservatives to give directly to candidates they support. In his next newsletter, Perkins will tell supporters, "I've hinted at this before, but now I am saying it: Don't give money to the RNC. If you want to put money into the political process, and I encourage you to do so, give directly to candidates who you know reflect your values."
The Republican establishment is also seeking to create an organization through which wealthy business conservatives can support party efforts without having to give Steele their money. The new group, to be called Americans Crossroads, will be run by Mike Duncan, Steele’s predecessor at the RNC, and advised by other recent RNC chairs and Karl Rove. American Crossroads is seeking to raise $52 million, and by recruiting leadership of such impeccable insider credentials, is obviously presenting itself as a competent, shadow version of the RNC.
So if Steele's leadership is so bad that he’s forced Republicans to abandon their central party organization, why don’t they just toss the guy? This question has come up a few times since he became chairman, and there’s usually one answer: GOP leaders are afraid of how it would look for their all-white party to fire their first black leader. As one high-level operative told Politico in January,
"You're not going to dump the first African-American chairman. That's the only reason. Otherwise, he'd be gone."