Krugman's tour de force: Building a Green Economy
Today's New York Times features a piece of writing which should be required reading for every American. This is not a piece from his blog, but a "Magazine Preview", which means it's rather lengthy. On an issue this important, the ten pages of length are appreciated.
To anyone who may still doubt that real progress on the climate change issue will "cost too much", we learn that the truth is less than economic Armageddon.
Winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics, Paul Krugman:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/4/8/855236/-Krugmans-tour-de-force:-Building-a-Green-EconomyBuilding a Green Economy
by Paul Krugman
..................
In fact, once you filter out the noise generated by special-interest groups, you discover that there is widespread agreement among environmental economists that a market-based program to deal with the threat of climate change — one that limits carbon emissions by putting a price on them — can achieve large results at modest, though not trivial, cost. There is, however, much less agreement on how fast we should move, whether major conservation efforts should start almost immediately or be gradually increased over the course of many decades.
.............
Some senators have recently floated a proposal for a sort of hybrid solution, with cap and trade for some parts of the economy and carbon taxes for others — mainly oil and gas. The political logic seems to be that the oil industry thinks consumers won’t blame it for higher gas prices if those prices reflect an explicit tax.
In any case, experience suggests that market-based emission controls work. Our recent history with acid rain shows as much. The Clean Air Act of 1990 introduced a cap-and-trade system in which power plants could buy and sell the right to emit sulfur dioxide, leaving it up to individual companies to manage their own business within the new limits.
..................
There’s a pretty good chance that the record temperatures the world outside Washington has seen so far this year will continue, depriving climate skeptics of one of their main talking points. And in a more general sense, given the twists and turns of American politics in recent years — since 2005 the conventional wisdom has gone from permanent Republican domination to permanent Democratic domination to God knows what — there has to be a real chance that political support for action on climate change will revive.
more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/magazine/11Economy-t.html