Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am crying, and shaking and physically ill after reading this

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
electprogdems Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:24 PM
Original message
I am crying, and shaking and physically ill after reading this
what the fuck is wrong with this Country??? - We must take it back from the religioius wackos. Stuff like this just cannot be allowed to go on. i can't even begin to type a recap of the story without shaking. Someone else will have to do that

http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.myfoxtampabay.com%2Fmyfox%2Fpages%2FHome%2FDetail%3FcontentId%3D2212387%26version%3D3%26locale%3DEN-US%26layoutCode%3DTSTY%26pageId%3D1.1.1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Police are friggin' idiots. I detest cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I agree that they fucked up, but that's over the top --
My husband is a police officer and a damn good one. Who would you call if someone broke into your house at 3 am, or hurt you or one of your kids?

They're human, and they make mistakes - so does everyone else.

The majority of police officers in this country are doing good by their communities every single day, putting their lives on the line every goddamn day to keep your ass safe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Police officers, as a group, tend to be
habitual bullies. I've had to speak to police 4 times in my life in 2 different cities, and they were rude, beligerant, and unhelpful each time. I've known several cops as friends of friends, or family of friends, and only one of them was a kind person. Add that to the constant stories of profiling and civil rights abuses, and I find it very difficult to respect police officers as people.

If my house gets broken into I'll call them, and I'll wonder whether or not they'll simply do their jobs politely and professionally and take a report. It seems that acting polite and professional is beyond most police officers.

Horrible behavior by cops is so common that this story doesn't surprise me at all. What surprises me is that it made the newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. delete sorry responded to wrong poster
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 01:07 PM by Unperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. This story isn't about cops...
Police officers don't decide who to charge with what -- this is about a county prosecutor who really needs to be voted out of office in the next election. What happened to this woman is beyond merely inexcusable, but it wasn't the fault of the police officers involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. It is about the cops.
Cops don't check with the prosecutor before arresting someone. The cops make the call who to arrest and what to charge them with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Don't know much about police procedure, do you?
Cops can detain someone for questioning, but they don't decide who gets charged. Unless you're living in some freaky jurisdiction I've never heard of before, only a prosecutor can bring criminal charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. So you really believe
that cops call the prosecutors for permission before arresting people? You're nuts.

The prosecutors don't get involved until After people get arrested unless there has been an investigation first that involved the prosecutor's office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. It's not about belief...
Cops can detain and question a suspect, but they're not legally under arrest until prosecutor brings charges -- I was a reporter for several years and watched the process first-hand. I've never heard of a jurisdiction where the police are allowed to bring formal charges without a prosecutor being involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Tell that to the people who get arrested,
held, finger printed and go through hell like this woman. If a prosecutor comes in at the 11th hour and doesn't prosecute, that doesn't mean she wasn't arrested. It means she wasn't brought to trial.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Dupe
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 01:26 PM by ThomCat


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Which the average citizen doesn't know and the cops exploit the lack of knowledge to get the person
to answer questions without a lawyer present. If you live in a state that doesn't video tape or record the "interview" then your best bet is to not answer any questions put to you unless a lawyer is present. Prisons are full of people who made the mistake of answering questions without legal aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. Got that right...
Without a lawyer present, I wouldn't give a police officer the time of day (literally).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
65. Arresting someone and charging them are not the same thing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #65
81. Tell it to potential employers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
63. Um, no they don't need "permission" to arrest someone - there are already
rules about when and whom to arrest. Once they arrest is made, the officer files a report and then the case is turned over to the DA's office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #63
97. You got that right, failure to show up at a police station for a criminal interview will end up in
a warrant of said persons arrest. You can also be charged with evading and eluding a police officer if you don't show up for a requested interview with police. Same thing applies to a crime committed in front of the police. Drunk drivers are charged before a DA ever see's a report on the incident. Btw, if you request a lawyer and you can not afford a lawyer, then you are arrested and jailed. You sit in jail until you see a judge, he appoints an attorney, and sets your bail. Catch 22 that most poor people get caught up in, they know that asking for a court appointed lawyer will get them arrested and jailed so to avoid both they try to talk their way out of the charges and end up confessing to the crime. Happens 1,000 of times a day nation wide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. I've mostly had good experiences with police...
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 01:14 PM by TygrBright
...but I'm VERY well aware that a big part of the reason for that is that I am a law-abiding, non-threatening, middle-class white female who learned early on to treat officers of the law with respect for the job they do. Only a couple of those factors are in my control and I certainly can't take personal credit for the other ones.

That said, my impression overall is that cops are a very mixed bag, and much depends on the location, the leadership, and the budget available to make the job do-able. I HAVE seen lousy cops, bullying cops, dirty cops, etc., but in most cases (though not all by any means) I think that could be traced to the recruitment and training practices of the police force, and the leadership of senior officers and political leaders. There seems to be very little positive leadership in many areas. The Police Commissioners, Mayors, Chiefs of Police, etc., who think that stern warnings about "zero tolerance" for police misbehavior will do the trick are barking up the wrong tree.

And finally I think that the greatest share of responsibility rests where (ultimately) all responsibility for the public good rests: With us, the citizens. Do we want a police force that is professional, competent, intelligent, tough AND humane? Then we must both demand such a force and be prepared to pay for it, and we must support it when we have it. If, on the other hand, what we want is just a bunch of cheap near-thugs who will keep "the bad guys" out of sight/out of mind, well, that's what we'll get.

And it's a damn' shame for all the intelligent, competent men and women who sincerely want to serve their communities and end up in those police forces.

regretfully,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
64. Good For You, I Am Also A Law Abiding White Middle Class Home Owning Female
I have had to call the cops twice because of neighbors (renters) destroying my property. I was pretty much blown off because the idiots who lived next door happened to be male. The incident involved the bitch next door shoving me after I asked their son to stop riding his bike over drywall I had in my driveway, and I also said something to him about asking his parents to stop throwing their cigarette butts into my garden. These idiots also pulled up one of my trees.(The unemployed lazy ass dude was a Hannity fan...) It sucks when you call to make a report and the cops don't bother to ask neighbors across the street who saw the whole thing, but tell you - well, that's not what you r neighbors said happened WTF? I have also worked directly with police for several years, most of them are bigoted, women hating pigs, who think they are above the law. Ever notice how many of them get fired every year? You know they only catch some of the crap they pull, they pretty much cover up for each other. So don't try to tell me that if you are law abiding the cops will treat you rtight....in your dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. Yes, the police world is often good ole boy and white, at that.
Of course there are great policemen out there. No question.

However, the police world was originally created by the white men and for the white men to be protected from everyone else, including their wives and women at large.

For the most part, the police world is not nearly as fair and protective to women and anyone else who is not a white male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. I Agree with You, Too Often They Let Their Preconceived Notions Override Facts
Yes, there are good cops, but there are more with "little man syndrome" - the I'll show you who's boss types. I think possibly a good number of them were bullied in school and are now overcompensating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
62. It seems to me that acting professional and polite is beyond most PEOPLE
no single group of professionals in particular.

I think the left has a disgusting bias against law enforcement in general, jmho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #62
77. The left has been targetted by law enforcement often enough.
There are good reasons for that bias. If people gets slapped often enough, they start to distrust the person who keeps slapping them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. "There are good reasons for that bias."
There certainly are, so long as you ignore any evidence that contradicts your stereotypes.

If people gets slapped often enough, they start to distrust the person who keeps slapping them.

Isn't that an argument that would justify police distrusting "liberals" like yourself? After all, if a police officer extrapolated from certain posts on this thread, all liberals dislike, distrust, and generally demean police officers, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. Right
because we on the left have any ability to slap the police. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. You didn't really address the point.
Isn't the type of unthinking response to police officers that your posts demonstrate precisely the kind of unthinking response your decry when it comes from the police?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #89
90. No.
Because this thread is full of good examples of why often the police can't be trusted, don't act professional, and are more concerned about their own authority than about other people's saftey.

How many people need to have bad experiences, and how often, and with how many different cops before you would accept that there's a problem?

Some people choose to be blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Acknowledging the good performed by police isn't being blind to the bad officers
Do you honestly think that all (or even most) police officers care more about their own authority than about other people's safety?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #91
95. Yes.
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 04:52 PM by ThomCat
Most of them care about showing up at work, going home at the end of they day, and then getting paid at the end of the week. The idea that police officers have some special altruism is ridiculous.

The idea that any group of people who are given arbitrary authority somehow don't care about it and don't use it is equally ridiculous.

I am sure that each cop cares about the safety so some people, but that concern is almost certainly selective. Ask people in minority neighborhoods. Ask people near Indian Reservations. Ask people in most poor neighborhoods. So they're wonderful as long as you're one of the people who's safety they are concerned about, but I doubt very many police officers give a damn about they safety of all people in general.

If you give anyone arbitrary authority with little or no oversight, and then tell them to be altruistic, you would be a fool to blindly expect them to be altruistic. A few of them would be altruistic, but very few.

Edit for spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #91
109. From another thread here at DU
Seattle cops lost a lawsuit. The judge ruled that the cops violated the civil rights of protesters.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2709572

It's already been discussed here many times that the cops attacked peaceful protesters, lied and claimed they were responding to provocations (even when video tapes showed the cops discussing the attack in advance showing that it was premeditated and unprovoked).

I've seen similar responses here in NYC repeatedly. And because they've been videotaped beating people so often now, cops now target photographers.

That's not a few bad apples. That's the entire department. That's an organized, coordinated action against innocent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #109
111. Oh! Well that changes everything!
Wait...no it doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. Your post has no substance.
What's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
92. I'm with you ThomCat
Of all the times that I have dealt with the brown shirts I only had one experience that I wasn't treated like dirt. I really hate cops they are a scourge on all freedom loving people. Check out this video that was made by the ACLU, its on how to get thru a meeting with these fascists. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NmC5wHfCdM&mode=related&search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. How much freedom do you think you'd have if all the police, good and bad, disappeared?
I really hate cops they are a scourge on all freedom loving people.


I can't decide if you're a troll or just that simple-minded. Maybe both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. I don't mind if you don't believe me or not
But after witnessing someone getting the shit kicked out of them by the police on more than one occasion with a promise from them that if we saw anything we were next, you really can develop a hatred for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #94
101. You didn't answer the question.
What do you think would happen if every police officer were to disappear tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. It's an absurd question.
It implies that the only choice is cops as corrupt as they are now, or no cops at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. Its in response to an absurd statement
namely, that "(cops) are a scourge on all freedom loving people".

If the poster truly believes that, or if you agree with that sentiment, then the question is perfectly reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #101
105. You won't like my answer
There will be a lot less stealing and murders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #105
108. There would be less theft and murder with no police, huh?
I'd love to hear an explanation for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #108
114. Organized crime in the U.S. stems from prohibition. You'll have a hard time proving otherwise.
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 06:20 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Criminal prohibition policies create an underground economy and MASSIVE amounts of crime which you yourself have become inured to,

which entire police forces benefit from.

You see a similar phenomenon in a different arena with jurisdictions that rely on speeding tickets to pay for police and schools, without actually caring whether the speed of traffic is reduced.

Ask them to narrow the roads so that it would be dangerous for cars to drive over the speed limit, and they will look at you funny.

So I ask of you, imagine how much crime in this country there would be if we DID have a police force. For the answer, look around. Do you lock your doors at night? Why? You have become inured to levels of crime so high that they prompt you to lock your doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #114
118. Those are legislative issue, not law enforcement.
I agree that prohibition encourages much illegal activity. Last time I checked, though, it was our representatives in Congress & the state legislatures that are responsible for those laws, not the local police department.

The question is what would happen if the "scourge on freedom loving people" were to disappear tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Label Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #118
127. Ok I'll answer
Then 74 year old veterans wouldn't get beat up by the thugs you keep defending.
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_5099999

War vet, 74, says cops roughed him up
Police may have thought he had a gun; 'officers decided to go hands-on,' says one report
By Matthew D. LaPlante
and Jeremiah Stettler
The Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated: 01/27/2007 06:42:25 PM MST


Click photo to enlargeMiles Lund, 74, a wounded Korean War veteran who likes to... (Chris Detrick/The Salt Lake Tribune)«1»A 74-year-old Korean War veteran was held at gunpoint and then tackled by Salt Lake City police officers after he refused to comply with orders to raise his hands above his head.
Miles Lund said he tried to tell the officers - who believed he was carrying a gun - that his war injuries rendered his right arm immobile.
"But they just wouldn't listen," he said.
Instead, according to witness accounts and a police report, at least three officers tackled the man, wrestling him to the ground at Liberty Park and wrenching his arms behind his back to handcuff him.
Lund said at least one officer also kicked him in the ribs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #127
129. No, you still didn't really answer.
You answered with an example of police doing their job very, very poorly. As is indicated by many other posts on this thread, the existence of bad officers is not really contested by me or anyone else here. I understand very well both the existence and the consequences of corrupt and/or bad police officers.

The question was what would happen to our society if you could wave a magic wand and make the "scourge on freedom loving people" disappear completely. No traffic cops, no detectives, no street patrol, no jails, no emergency responders, none of them. What do you think would happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. You have to realize
that the police were instituted to protect property, and rich people, not all people. Even now when police are supposed to protect everyone that protection is always uneven. Rich white people get consistent safety. Almost everyone else has to worry as much about the cops as they do about the criminals.

It's nice that there are cops to keep the criminals scared and careful, but do they have to keep the rest of us scared too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #96
100. I realize that police do not exist in a societal vacuum. That's not really news.
Of course the rich and privileged generally receive better services from the government, and police services are no exception. Police officers are subject to the same prejudices and failings as the rest of us. Some police officers let their prejudices get the better of them, just like some lawyers, doctors, and teacher do.


Almost everyone else has to worry as much about the cops as they do about the criminals.


You can't be serious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #100
103. I am serious.
I'm a white, middle ages, middle class guy who's clearly physically disabled. I'm one of those people you think the cops would be trying to at least appear to protect. As as I've already posted, I'm had nothing but bad encounters with cops.

Others have posted the same thing.

In decades of volunteer work I've listened to countless other volunteers, clients, neighborhood kids, people in soup kitchens and people everywhere I've volunteered. Distrust of cops is common, and it isn't an because all of these people just woke up one morning and decided on a whim that cops can be a problem.

I'm in NYC, and I've stood and watched cops at demonstrations and rallies. I've watched their hostility.

Take a look at all the videos that are now available online of police brutality, and how much more often are they brutal when there's no video camera?

People do need to worry about the cops far more often than you are willing to accept. But whether you accept it or not is irrelevant. It just shows that you're naive and sheltered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #103
110. You're avoiding the issue.
Simply repeating ad nauseum that there are bad police officers doing bad things in the world may make you feel like you're scoring rhetorical points, but it simply isn't the issue. There is no one here arguing that all police officers are good at their job and free from corruption. I've been involved in legal issues arising out of some of the most horrible conduct imaginable performed by LEO's. I don't need YouTube to show me what can happen when authority is abuse. I've also seen firsthand LEO's literally save others' lives while putting their own at risk.

The issue is whether or not you're willing to acknowledge that even with the existence of bad officers, the good ones do in fact exist and should be supported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. I'm not avoiding the issue. You are.
It's not a couple of bad cops. It's entire departments. It's the culture of law enforcement.

You can't have the volume to abuse, and the scope of large civil rights abuses, unless it's a problem throughout the department. Look at how much of the civil rights movement has had to target law enforcement abuses.

Insisting that it's a rare problem doesn't make it so.

Yes, some cops are good people and try to do a good job, but if you're in a corrupt environment just going along with the way things are means you're helping with the corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #112
115. You didn't really just go with "No I'm not, you are", did you?
Let's try this again: I'm not arguing that police corruption doesn't exist, nor am I arguing that it isn't a problem. A bad officer does horrendous damage to all of us. Again, I don't need to rely on the internet for this, I've seen the results with my own eyes. Those officers, and those departments, should be prosecuted vigorously and aggressively. Unfortunately, it does happen all too often that societal problems are reflected in the police force.

I am arguing that blanket statements condemning the entire group are willfully ignorant. For every instance you've referenced that highlights police misconduct, I could post a dozen demonstrating officers behaving commendably under very unfavorable circumstances. I'm perfectly willing (eager, actually) to condemn bad police work, but you have demonstrated no similar willingness to recognize the good that is performed by police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #115
119. Oh please.
You're looking for someone to sing praises of all those hard working wonderful police officers who selflessly put their lives on the line day after day, looking down barrels of criminal's guns every day before lunch. :eyes:

You've been drawn out, throughout this thread, to finally admit that there is corruption, and that it is widespread, but you're still looking for cheerleaders.

Law enforcement is a racket, like everything else. I'll love and respect the good cops when I finally meet some.

One retired cop (of several that I know) I thought was a really nice guy, but I know that on the job he went along to get along. So if that's the best I've ever met, where are these upstanding, virtuous defenders you keep talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #119
123. If *you've* never experienced it, it must not exist, right?
I know you're being sarcastic, but you know what? The world does contain some wonderful police officers that *do* act selflessly, that *do* put their lives on the line day after day, and *do* look down the barrels of criminal's guns sometimes. Here in Chicago, there are literally hundreds of examples every week where police officers put themselves at risk to help someone else. There are also numerous examples of bad officers every week, unfortunately. Do not assume that just because you're unwilling to remove your blinders, the rest of the world is so limited.

Have a good evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #123
124. You're the one wearing blinders.
I don't assume that what I haven't seen doesn't exist. I just assume it's rare, and you've said nothing and presented no evidence to show otherwise. You're just insisting that I'm wrong simply because you want me to be wrong. I hope you enjoy that bubble you live in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #103
117. the thing is that most people are similarly sheltered
Police are a problem for minorities and people who live or hang out on the streets. That's not most people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #117
121. Minorities not most people?
If you take everyone who is black, hispanic, asian, identifiably GLBT, and/or poor you've got the majority. What percentage of people are left?

And that part about people who hang out on the street sounds like a slur. Are you saying that all people who dislike the police are hanging out on the street? And what, exactly, is wrong with hanging out on the street?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. The cops in my community are ALL corrupt.
One of them was brought up on charges of giving a fourteen year old girl Crystal Methamphetamine and then raping her. The charges were dropped. The women in my community all tell new people not to stop for this one cop because if you are a single woman, driving alone he is likely to accost you. I'll say 90 per cent of them are despicable corrupt assholes and I hate the whole lot them. That is still my right, isn't it? Or must I smile while I hand the executioner the blade with which he will cut my throat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. How can you argue with anecdotal evidence like that? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. When the anecdotal evidence starts to pile up
it starts to be more than mere anecdote. When enough people start having the same experiences it becomes a pattern and it becomes credible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. And your vast resevoir of evidence comes from a lifetime total of four (4) encounters?
I'm not arguing the point that some police officers are, indeed corrupt and/or assholes that are not good at their job. I am arguing that extrapolating an amazingly small amount of experience to impugn an entire group of people that do a very, very difficult job is rather silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. 4 official encounters
plus the people I've met socially many times, plus the encounters of many people I've known and the many encounters people have posted here.

Minimize it all you want, but you're just whitewashing attrocities. It's people who insist that cops are sterling and need to be constantly given the benefit of the doubt over and over and over again who allow things like this story to happen.

Cops have a lot of power and authority, and very little oversight. Civilian review boards are a joke with no authority. You put authoritarian people in a position with that much power, and no oversight, and abuses happen. No fairytales about how saintly and devoted cops are is going to change that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. Oh, please. I'm not "whitewashing atrocities", I'm calling bullshit on blanket statements
I am quite aware of what happens when police officers abuse their position. (Google "Jon Burge" and read about some of the things that can happen). I don't insist that "cops are sterling" nor do I believe that police are "saintly". That kind of nonsense only serves to distort the conversation and provide you with straw-men to knock down.

I do argue that police officers are people. Not all good, not all bad, just people. And I happen to think that they are people doing a very, very difficult job without which we simply couldn't function as a society. I've known a lot of LEO's in my life, and some of them I wouldn't trust to walk me across the street. Others, however, have done an amazing amount of good and helped countless people by doing their jobs well. I'm sorry if you think that's a fairytale because it doesn't fit your rather simplistic view of the situation, but the world is a lot bigger than your four official encounters.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. And yet, with all that supposed nuance
your point is still that we shouldn't talk about what police do, or draw any conclusions about it, because you know so much better than all of us. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Again, straw-men are not necessarily useful to the discussion.
If you could kindly point out where I suggested any such thing, I would appreciate it. Otherwise, I'll assume its more knee-jerk nonsense that only obscures the actual issue.

We certainly should talk about what police do, we should view their actions and rationalizations with skepticism, and we should tolerate absolutely no corruption. Bad police officers do an amazing amount of damage to society and make the job that much more difficult for honest/good officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
59. In northern Illinois there are three separate groups
First - chicago cops. for the most part, well trained, and extremely professional. These guys (collectively male and female) are some of the best, street smart people around. Sure, there have been true criminals lik Commander Burge, a retired detective now on trial for beating confessions out of innocents, and a few who were moles for the Chicago Mafia, but the large majority are superb.

Then you have suburban cops. these break down into two groups. Some, like Evanston, Orland Park and a few other locales, have highly trained, responsive and good cops. I trust them and I know how much to push them in court. But, a large majority of other suburbs' cops would find it hard to work in the real world. Their love of carrying a gun, driving a new, shiny car with way too many lights (ever notice that the smaller the police force, the greater number of lights they install on their squad cars?) and they get to go really fast for no reason. These guys can be real idiots. Dangerous, thuggish, pushy and il-trained, dealing with them on a professional level is something else.

Of course we have state cops, county cops, forest preserve cops and semi-private cops, all with various levels of experience and training, but of all of the above, one group truly stands out. and not as outstanding, but the opposite. The Homeless Scrutiny Assholes who hired Transporation Security Apes have to be the worst trained, least capable, most arrogant, decisively pushy, dumber than a pet rock, and the most likely to arrest or threaten arrest for no reason other than your making eye contact with them.

Think of FBI rejects on speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. You forgot


....the "good old boy" cops that we have up by the border. I had a problem with our local sheriff over finger printing our 1st graders for ID kits. I finally contacted the County Sheriffs who said they would be happy to do it and they would pay for the kits. Local Sheriff had a hissy fit and asked me who I thought I was to go over his head. County Sheriff came to my house to warn me that the local guy was going to try to get me back and gave me his card and cell number....told me to call him immediately if I was ever pulled over by the local cops. He also told the local sheriff to be careful because they were watching.

Fortunately, the local guy is gone and I still run into the County Sheriff occasionally.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #59
69. Too Funny About the Lights - Our Town's Cruisers Could Bring On a Seizure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
66. So one bad cop means they are all bad, right? That's some super
deductive reasoning for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #66
79. So if someone mentions patterns of corruption
and gives one example, you assume that only that one example happened?

That's some super deductive reasoning for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #79
85. Examples, please.
Who mentioned one example and assumed that only one example happened? This wouldn't be another example of the straw-man, would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #66
86. I had my home invaded by seven of them for a noise complaint
They proceeded to perform a search- opening closets and drawers- until I herded them all into the living room and collectively got their names and badge numbers. For this, I earned a cracked rib when one of them shoved me into an interior doorknob.

Two of them were wearing 'training' badges on their uniforms.

YOU tell ME if I should have any trust in the people wearing uniform.

Ten years ago, several hundred dollars' worth of video games and other electronics- including two game systems- were stolen from my apartment. The person who stole them- whom I knew- left a note saying he was 'borrowing' it. He even signed it. Not only was the value of the items minimized (the police refused to value it at retail price, and downgraded it until it was a small claims case) but in fact refused to pursue the case any further, even though they knew exactly what was stolen and who stole it.

So, that's twice- once with stolen property and once with a case of actual brutality and illegal searches- that I've had bad experiences.

No, three times. One fine fall afternoon I was jogging and a cop stopped me to question who I was, where I was going, and where I lived. Then he drove off.

I think you may be deeply out of touch regarding how exactly police today behave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. I walk with a cane.
I had cops stop me and demand to see my prescription for the cane and all but accused me of walking around with a weapon.

I've had my home burglarized and had cops refuse to even take a report.

I had a roommate disappear unexpectedly for 4 days. I tried to file a missing person's report. The cops asked me if we were lovers and had a spat. They all laughed and refused to take a report.

I had someone stalking me and sending me threating mail. The cops laughed at me when I tried to report it and file a complaint. They accused me of being the harrasser's lover and told me that it's what I deserve for knowing someone "like that."

Yeah, I have lots of reasons to respect cops. I've seen them be so respectful. And their jobs are so dangerous when they're sitting behind a desk mocking people and refusing to fill out a report. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #66
126. Look, I'm not trying to defend a peer reviewed paper I wrote or anything.
I hate cops. I have good reason. It is my personal experience, what I have seen in the news and witnessed first hand has brought me to this conclusion. It is my sound opinion. Cops are fascist pigs. Fuck em'. I'm not trying to prove anything to you. I really don't care what you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
56. I agree....
Father in law is a cop, and he's one of the kindest and most honest men you will meet. There are good apples and bad apples out there. Hopefully, the bad apples who arrested this woman will be punished and held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I detest people that do an incredibly vital job for relatively little money
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 01:13 PM by Raskolnik
People that put themselves at risk for the safety of others, people without whom society would rapidly deteriorate, people who unfortunately suffer from the same flaws as the rest of humanity...those people are *assholes*.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. OK which of your family members is a cop?
Or are you a cop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Father is a retired deputy sheriff
Now would you care to address my post, or would you rather make this personal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unperson Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. You are making this personal and you clearly have an agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Agreed.
Nobody knows better than him because he knows a retired cop. Everyone else's experience is too limited to draw conclusions, and everyone else's experience is just anecdotal. But his opinions are authoritative.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. No, I'm certainly not authoritative
And I'm not claiming that my experience is 100% representative. That is why I'm not the one making blanket statements about how all police are (insert character trait here).

To do so would be rather silly, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. My "agenda" is arguing that your post is utter bullshit.
I don't really care who you are, I just think you make a remarkably moronic statement.

Perhaps you could point out which of these statements you take issue with: (1)police officers are asked to perform a very difficult, often dangerous, job; (2)society could not function without someone performing that job; and (3)while some police officers are indeed corrupt and/or bad at their job, many others are very good at it and we all benefit from their effort.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #42
68. So our opinions are invalid while yours is perfectly valid?
I call bullshit big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #68
80. So because you like cops
those of us with bad experiences are wrong?

I call bullshit big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #80
116. Never said "I like cops" -- what I said was
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 06:34 PM by Katherine Brengle
that they are human beings and all human beings sometimes fuck up.

Many of them are good, honest people just trying to do a little good in their communities.

Just as those many do not eliminate the few bad ones, the few bad ones do not eliminate the many good ones.

Keep your blinders on if you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #116
125. You assume
that there are few bad ones and many good ones. I think that ratio is backwards, and I think history and evidence is on my side. But keep your blinders on if you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
50. Yes, many of them are.
Yes, many of them have dangerous jobs. But that isn't an excuse for abuses of power. It's amazing how many excuses people make to defend abuses of power.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #50
58. Your logic is faulty
Arguing that a statement such as "Police are friggin' idiots" is foolish is not excusing abuses of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
67. I hope this was missing from that post ----
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #67
75. Yes, it was definitely sarcastic. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
82. I agree completely. Cops do a thankless job, get paid less
than teachers, and get shit on (often literally) by the community. While there are occasionally a-hole cops (just as in the civilian population), by and large they are great men and women who deserve our respect--unless they specifically and individually do something to lose it.

It sickens me how so many DU'ers are knee-jerking, declaring "all" cops are racists, fascists and scum.

And no, I am not a cop, and have never been related to one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #82
120. Thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
99. They've been pretty good to me
Though a few in this suburb I live in can be Nazis, mostly out of boredom than anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
122. There are plenty of good cops out there.
You're statement is as ridiculous as saying "soldiers are idiots" because of Abu Ghraib, the water bottle taunting, etc.

SOME police are idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're not alone:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, for one, the medical supervisor who forced her religious beliefs on
the woman needs to be fired immediately. She is not qualified for her position. And I hope the woman sues the ever lovin' sh!t out of everyone involved, as she was not treated properly at all.

Then she needs to sue them again for wrongful arrest, since she should have never been arrested in the first place if it was based on a paperwork error.

You are exactly right - something is very wrong with this country, and to fix it we must SEPARATE CHURCH AND STATE. It has never worked, it will never work, and that is why things suck so bad for so many right now.

This story made me angry as well. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I agree
That is beyond disgusting; what a way to treat a victim of a horrible crime.

A lot of it sounds like sheer incompetence, which causes a lot of the world's evils.

As regards the medical supervisor, if your beliefs prevent you from prescribing emergency contraception, then you shouldn't take a job where you're likely to have to do so, and especially NOT working with rape victims.

I hope she does sue the hell out of them all; sadly, this would mean her having to relive these horrible experiences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. I agree on all points.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
72. This Is the Main Point Here I Believe and I Agree, As Well As Pharmacists....
who push their morality on others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. That poor woman was raped twice
Once by her attacker and once by the system. I cannot believe that the jail refused to give her the morning after pill, that is absolutely deplorable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Skimmed it for the points to be taken.
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 12:33 PM by halobeam
couldn't stomach much of the details myself.

WTF is wrong with this country. I'll tell you what. This supervisor, IMO, should be sued for a damn good number of reasons, along with a whole host of others who were involved. I wouldn't let this go, if I were this poor, poor woman. I'd get immediate therapy and legal counsel simultaneously.

What a freakin' disgrace.:grr:

edit to add: recommended.

This is PAST an outrage!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Take a deep breath. It's not the country that did this.
Tampa Bay, Florida.

Florida.

Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Florida
have to agree. Look to the state itself, the massive corruption therein. Also, was she a white woman or a woman of color? Hard questions but they need to be asked.
Florida is on my "do not visit" list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:16 PM
Original message
Saw her blurred picture on local TV...she's white, and seems very pretty.
And it sounds like she truly thought the 4-year old charges were taken care of. Like she was accused of something, but no proof. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
61. I have to be a little skeptical that she had no clue about the charges
But what she was charged with does not justify the way she was treated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shoelace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #61
71. makes you wonder if
say, you are injured in an accident but have a very old warrent for some inconsequential thing (too many parking tickets? whatever), would they treat your injuries first or haul you in first, THEN treat your injuries?:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm surprised they didn't stone her!
It's outrageous & unconscionable that the girl's rape didn't get their full, immediate attention, & the fact that she wasn't allowed the Morning After pill proves that our laws have been hijacked by the religious nuts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope the ACLU takes up her case....
I was incredulous (although I shouldn't be by now) to read this, this morning...:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R...repulsive
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 12:42 PM by nam78_two
WTF...I just saw the part about the morning after pill :wtf:
My goodness...There are no words..A rape victim denied contraception :wtf:...

Why are these religious lunatics in positions like this...If your "beliefs" don't permit you to give someone contraception, don't take the fricking job :grr:.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdrichards114 Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. What happened to separation of Church and State!
And why the fuck is the state supporting one person's religous convictions over another. To cap it all off the Pigs take a person to jail who has just been raped. This society is completely fucked. There are so many good things about people in this country but the few proverbial bad apples have morphed into a whole fucking orchard and ruining everything they touch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. As far as the Religious Right is concerned there is no separation of church and state.
Never has been in their view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdrichards114 Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. You are correct, but regardless this is a country of laws,
and its about time we the people start acting in accordance with our own laws. It's time to shut these Christo-Facists down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Couldn't agree more
But it's gotten to the point (and I don't think I'm being TOO paranoid) at which the CFs seem to be everywhere. At least in some parts of the country we are asking Christo-fascists to enforce the law against other Christo-fascists and I don't think that they are inclined to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdrichards114 Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. I'm beyond asking anymore!
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 01:40 PM by pdrichards114
If they can't do their jobs, under the powers granted them by the constitution, then they should be fired. Citing religious reasons in a public servant's position of power for either performing, or in this case failing to perform the duties of the office should be grounds for immediate and unconditional termination.

Just a hope and a dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Would that it were that easy.
These people didn't get the power that they have today without knowing how to manipulate the system and without being plain ole in-your-face f--k you ballsy. Got to give them credit, they've done their work well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdrichards114 Donating Member (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. Too true. I guess they applied the 'ole Christian Work ethic.
To bad the end result isn't ethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strathos Donating Member (713 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. When is the "religious" excuse illegal?
Should the woman that refused to give the rape victim the pill be suspended?

How far are we going to let them carry this "religious excuse" until something is done about it.

I'm sick of them myself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. But, according to them and those who support them
We're infringing on THEIR rights for insisting they do their job, don't you see? If we don't allow them to insinuate themselves and their beliefs between us and our doctors and block prescriptions, we're infringing on their freedom of religion, or if they're a corporation, their freedom to basically do whatever the hell they want regardless of the consequences to any individual or the community at large. It's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
74. They Need To Stay Out of Public Life If They Don't Want To Play By the Rules
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #74
84. I don't think it's as simple as not wanting to play by the rules
They want to remake public life in their own image
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
we can do it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #84
128. I Agree - I Probably Didn't Word My Response Correctly
I am sick to death of ANY religious asshole who feels the need to impose their religion on anyone else. Fine if they want to practice their religion off the clock, but don't bring your shit to me at work. If I am asking (paying) for a service, that's what I want, not what the person I am paying to do their job thinks I should have. Sheesh can you imagine going to buy paint and having the counter person saying "blue??? oh no its against my religion to touch anything blue. You'll have to go to another store to get anything blue." Its about that stupid. Do your job right or find another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. If you truly want your anger and disgust to be noted
Please write to the mayor of that city and tell them that not only will you never attend the Gasparilla festival there, that you will spread the word amongst friends and family to stay out of Tampa as well.

Money talks. If women throughout the country get the idea that they are not safe to visit Tampa, those tourist dollars dry up.

It's worth a try. They're more concerned about the tourism money drying up than about their policies. Believe me.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaBanty Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
26. another case of the "rest of us"...
being manipulated by Fundies. To deny this woman contraception after rape was purely a judgment call made by one of the many poster children of Judgment. And, you know, this f*ck'tard pharamacist will suffer no consequences because his or her legal right to deny contraception (for religious reasons) is legally protected. (Gawd and baby Jeezus both love babies born from rape, since all life is precious, dontchya know.)

And, speaking of religious extremists, the only thing that would ice the cake on this tragedy is if her own family killed her for "dishonoring them", because, after all, they're just practicing their f*cked up religion. Let's not forget another religion that thinks the person actually raped has dishonored their family, and must be killed. I mean - in all fairness - it isn't just the goddamned Fundie Christians that are mentally ill.

I liked religion a helluva lot better when it was practiced underground and out of the mainstream. Like, in the catacombs. As long as religious Fundies are emboldened, empowered, and unaccountable - we will continue to be victims of every wacko's f*cked up ideologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twilight_sailing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. A bird in the hand
is worth two in the bush, I guess.

It's so much EASIER for the lazy cops, isn't it?

Lazy, heartless bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
33. Absolutely unbelievable, until you realize it's Florida. But it
could also happen in any small town that's been taken over by right wing whackos.
After six years of Bushie boy emboldening these fundinazis, it's going to take a lot of work and a long time to reduce their power.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. Step 1: Re-assert the terms of our common contract (the Constitution)
Edited on Tue Jan-30-07 01:38 PM by pat_k
We cannot effectively oppose the fascist factions in a burning house.

It is impossible for our leaders to speak in inspiring terms about who we are as a nation if they refuse to point to the fascist "unitary authoritarian executive" and say:
"That is the OPPOSITE of who we are, and Americans must prove it by removing the threat these lawless men pose to the Constitution; our common contract; the soul of the nation. Bush and Cheney have put that contract into breach. The ONLY way to reassert the terms is through Impeachment, the sole mechanism we established to defend against such attacks from within."
Impeachment is a message of hope, and a declaration of our power. It is the means by which our Congressional leaders can inspire the nation to oppose religious reactionaries and other fascist factions.

It's gonna take http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3086616&mesg_id=3086616">a Big Clue Stick to wake up the Congressional leadership to the stark reality of Bush World and their duty to get us OUT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
53. That is a horrific story
I'm shocked that something like this happened, and I truly hope that the police department is held accountable. It's awful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat 333 Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
70. Unbelievable
The US is a scary, spooky, place. Florida is exceptionally terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
78. WHY am I not surprised in the least?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Verde Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
98. It's as if Mary Baker Eddy was reincarnated with a mix of Toquamada and Stalin
to make these things happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
104. Religious fundamentalists have no place in the medical field.
What a disgrace it is for someone in that position to place her beliefs over the wishes of the victim and the recommendations of the doctors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-30-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
106. I'm with you on this
I want to scream. The insanity of it makes my brain bleed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-31-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
130. Locking.
Discussion here has veered off topic from the original post and has increasingly become a stew of personal sniping.

Thanks for your consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC