Flexible Spending Accounts will be limited to $2500 beginning in 2013.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB127032871499171957.html?mod=WSJ_PersonalFinance_PF4By KRISTEN GERENCHER
Will it take a new ceiling on flexible spending accounts to encourage people who have them to reap their benefits more completely?
In 2013, the new health-reform law will limit the amount you can sock away in a flexible spending account (FSA) for health expenses to $2,500 a year, with annual increases reflecting cost-of-living adjustments. Today, on average, only a third of people offered FSAs contribute to them at all, according to Mercer, a New York-based consulting firm.
This is sad thing for me. I have wife and son who are dealing with chronic health issues and I max out this contribution (now $6500) every year because its tax free money. Being tax free it really means I get about an additional $1000 to spend on health care related costs. I've usually spent that money by the end of May.
I think I understand why this change will occur. Paying taxes on the $4000 not put on the FSA will help pay for medical for others. I'm not thrilled about it, but what is done is done.
My employer also offers the chance to use Health Reimbursement Accounts which appears to be functionally the same as FSA. I know there are a few differences like the HRA rolling over.
My questions are:
Will there be a new much lower cap on HRAs under the new Health Care Reform? I ask because I've not seen anything mentioned yet.
If not, why are FSAs targeted but not HRAs? Being that they are almost functionally identical especially regarding taxes I don't understand the differential treatment.
edited to call the Health Reimbursement Accounts its proper name.