Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1994 Republican Rout Is Casting Shadow in 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:26 AM
Original message
1994 Republican Rout Is Casting Shadow in 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/us/politics/12elect.html?ref=todayspaper

<snip>
WASHINGTON — The year was 1994. Congressional Democrats were battered after a failed fight to pass a health care bill. It was the first midterm election for a new Democratic president, Bill Clinton. By overwhelming numbers, Americans thought the country was heading in the wrong direction, had unfavorable views of the president and Congress, and said it was time for new leadership in Washington.

That fall, Republicans swept to power, capturing 9 seats in the Senate and 52 in the House.

<snip>
“Obama has done the same kind of overreach that Clinton did back then with the tax increases and the crime bill,” said Joe Gaylord, the Gingrich adviser who directed the 1994 takeover strategy, and who is now advising Mr. Gingrich on a potential presidential run.

“I was just looking at some survey data this morning, and in every area now — from health care to education to balancing the budget to foreign policy — the Republicans have a lead over Democrats, policywise,” Mr. Gaylord said. “That makes it very much like 1994.”

<snip>
Moreover, the Republican Party has a different image than it did in 1994. At that time, Republicans had been out of control of Congress for long enough that they were able to present themselves as the party of change. They were viewed unfavorably by just 39 percent of Americans. By contrast, 57 percent said in February that they had an unfavorable view of Republicans in a New York Times/CBS News poll.

<snip>
Democrats also have fewer seats to defend. In 1994, Democrats had 28 retirements, putting many districts on the table that otherwise would have been safe. Last week, Representative Bart Stupak of Michigan announced that he would not seek re-election, pushing the number of Democrats who are retiring this year to 20, equal to the number of Republicans who are retiring. The number is still relatively low, though not as low as Democrats would have liked.

Perhaps more significant, in 1994 Democrats headed into the fall campaign after passing a crime bill that included a ban on assault weapons. The bill led to a backlash among independent voters, particularly in the South, which many Democrats argue was as much a factor in Democratic setbacks as the health care debacle.

.........more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not. Bloody. Likely
If any, the baggers candidates will siphon off Thug votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:36 AM
Original message
Most people see what they want to see.
I do not see the Republicans winning the House or the Senate.

Perhaps if the Democrats did not fight back, they might get enough voters to win back the House? I don't think that is going to happen. I think the battles are going to get intense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have a standing policy of not reading Adam Nagourney articles
I have long memories of his establishmentarian tripe from the 2006 and 2008 cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course Republicans are going to bring up '94.
2010 is NOTHING like it other than that Democrats are in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. I don't think that's going to happen this time. Dems have stomped Rs the past two election cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. can they really run effectively against health care reform? I don't think so.
The key will be energizing traditionally complacent voters for the Democratic majority to show up at the polls. It's a function of being in the majority already which has taken some of the steam out of Democratic voters. We need an energizing issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. I stopped reading at "a Gingrich adviser"
If he's so brilliant where's that 'permanent Republican majority' we used to hear so much about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. If there isn't a rout, it certainly won't be because of the Dem majority's performance
which has been deplorable, for the most part. It will simply be because the tea-bagger candidates are so wildly lame and crazy.

So we've got the corporatist status quo, and the whacko votes.

Can we get a voice of reason in there somewhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wouldn't believe what a newt adviser says
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ugh. The media wants this to be true *so badly.*
Edited on Mon Apr-12-10 09:51 AM by WilliamPitt
The numbers don't reflect the public opinions they keep pumping, and the Tea Party factional split in the Republican base is going to wreak bloody havoc for the GOP. Michael Steele isn't helping; his shenanigans have created a fundraising nightmare for the RNC.

So, yeah, I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC