|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
WillyT
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 08:59 PM Original message |
Don't We Need To Go Back To The Moon In Order To Practice For Going To Mars ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newest Reality
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. It might help if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. Im so glad we are going to Mars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. check this out..and the lies keep on comin'.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Whoa... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
50. "anchorette?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:14 PM Response to Original message |
4. I saw a special on cable a while back about launching from Earth's orbit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Yeah, the moon may have lower gravity, but it is still a gravity well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
59. The solution is simple, Spock... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
68. The moon has less then a fifth of the gravity of earth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:34 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. It would take a bit more than a fart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:37 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. I know, I was being a doofus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. That does add one reason to go back to the Moon - resources |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:50 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. The 150-200 year number is anti-nuke propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:40 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. That figure came from an article in Scientific American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Confusious
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:04 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. I don't know how they got it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:40 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. It's been a while since I read it - they could have been talking about current technology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. No... I'm Talking About Landing And Spending Time On Mars... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. No, they are totally different and the problems involved with the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. No IMO. The Earth is more similar to Mars than the Moon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
8. I'll bet a bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Yep . . . I'm with you . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:32 AM Response to Reply #8 |
41. Ever? As in not in 100 years, not in 1000 years, not in a million years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:41 AM Response to Reply #8 |
46. I'll see your bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken and raise you with one heart attack special.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. We're not going to Mars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. We put men on the moon, "using less computing power than your kid's calculator" ...!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:31 AM Response to Reply #25 |
32. Oh god, not one of those... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:06 AM Response to Reply #32 |
35. "Only fools never doubt" -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
60. cynical much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
75. No, I'm afraid we're not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
11. "A much shorter trip?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. No, worse. It's 593 times further to Mars than to the Moon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. and Mars is moving around the sun at a different rate than we are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. True. The range is about 55 million km to 400 million km. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:34 AM Response to Reply #18 |
42. Except projects like this take a decade. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. But How Are We To Practice Being On Another Planet ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Mars and the Moon are not similar at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Yeah... But Apollo 13 Might Be A Sober Reminder That We Are Not Infallible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. they do that on earth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
43. Exactly. You build a mockup on earth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Practice on the moon isn't going to replicate any of the conditions of Mars very well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleobulus
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. Oh, that won't happen, unless they are willing to burn a lot of fuel for the trip back... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
30. To be fair, the first few thousand kilometers are half the trip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Motown_Johnny
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. only if riding your tricycle will help you get your driver's license |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eppur_se_muova
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. The Moon's not "on the way" to Mars, it's a big change in delta-v to stop there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. And we're not about to build and fuel a rocket on the Moon that will get us to Mars! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SPedigrees
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
21. Been there, done that already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
24. No, the current idea is to go to asteroids instead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
27. I was hoping that Obama would propose an international "On to Mars" project |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:56 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. The Chinese aren't getting anyone to Mars any time soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:12 AM Response to Reply #27 |
36. Unfortunately, there are the Van Allen Radiation belts . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:39 AM Response to Reply #36 |
44. Science is dead. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Moon landing deniers are right up there with Homeopaths... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:30 PM Response to Reply #48 |
66. Deleted message |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. Pretty much every single sentence in your post is demonstratably wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FarCenter
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
31. A big challenge is turning feces and urine back into food and water during a 2 year duration trip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:40 AM Response to Reply #31 |
45. Water Yes. Food not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
33. I think the argument could be made either way. That focusing on going back to the moon will divert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BagongBansa
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:26 AM Response to Reply #33 |
40. keep 'em at home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I disagree wholeheartedly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BagongBansa
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
64. other stars yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One_Life_To_Give
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
61. Keeping humanity one asteroid strike from oblivion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:48 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. If that's the concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:13 AM Response to Original message |
37. Another positive about this is it would delay any theory of junking one planet and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
55. Actually, the idea is to speed up exploration beyond low Earth orbit, and get to Mars sooner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:22 AM Response to Original message |
38. I refuse to support a manned mission to Mars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
51. We could spend our money on more pressing needs. But NASA isn't getting a big chunk of "our money" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
39. The argument for "continuity" in NASA seems to be coming from the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:33 PM Response to Reply #39 |
67. It's a corporate NASA, evidently, just as much as our coporate MIC . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
47. We can get to Mars in about 40 days using an ion engine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
63. I though Ion drives took a really long time to get going. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
52. The moon is kinda passe as a photo op. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
53. What is the point of either? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:32 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. We can do both. And there was direct, on the spot science done on Apollo that could not have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #54 |
62. Why would we live on the moon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:47 PM Response to Reply #62 |
70. One of the main interests in the moon and those who controlled space agenda ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #53 |
69. Agree re "no point in sending people along anyway" -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
One_Life_To_Give
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
57. Wouldn't construct the ship on the moon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. In this case, distance is irrelevent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC