|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Apr-15-10 11:51 PM Original message |
The SEIU is forming a third party in North Carolina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
1. Expect some negative reaction in posting this information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Oh I expect it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
2. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WorseBeforeBetter
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. K&R, from North Carolina... (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthCarolina
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
26. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:33 AM Response to Original message |
5. I somewhat caught the SEIU guy on with Matthews, and he kept referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:38 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Skykell if memory serves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Deleted message |
Sherman A1
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
7. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Yes
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:47 AM Response to Original message |
8. Solidarity! K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. We have the Working Families Party in NYS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xchrom
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
10. Recommend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SocialistLez
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
11. I wish them luck! Is there no Green Party in NC? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
12. What Does This Serve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. To tell the Democratic Party that they continue to pander to corporations at their own risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:05 AM Response to Reply #25 |
54. As much as a support this movement, you're dead wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
29. The same role it served in other periods |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fading Captain
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
39. It serves notice: Serve us (the people) or them (Big Business) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mudoria
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
13. DOA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
14. I'm of two POVs on this..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mudoria
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:13 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It will not be good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
58. They will have the most influence in a swing state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
16. Stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:23 AM Response to Original message |
17. If they go about it right--winning the trust of voters in local elections |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
supernova
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
18. Good luck with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
19. Good for them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
20. Deleted message |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
21. If the national union doesn't squash this then I no longer support them. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Unions are never impressed with the whining of fair weather |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. They no solidarity to me, I no solidarity to them. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Apparently that's the same standard applied by the SEIU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Well perhaps it is time for blue dog democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Wow! it would be despotic and autocratic for the national union to quash its locals' activism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #21 |
40. Wow. So the unions have no right to support themselves? The Dems have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. They have a right to vote for whoever they want to. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
41. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. Good. I hope it spreads to other states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. Good news! maybe progressives will have some representation after all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LetsgoWings13
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. wouldn't that split our vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. The way the Union sees it, we are screwed either way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LetsgoWings13
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. so we need the third party to break up the current party to make it better in the future? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Read a little US History |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Nope. Please see: 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:49 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Ah yes, because we all know the USSC had no role |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. That doesn't mean that actually voting for the party that made it up will work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. So history and all it's evidence that Third Parties actually help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:45 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. You keep talking about "history" without actually citing any. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I have, and you keep citing the EXCEPTION of Bush v Gore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Help me out here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:10 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Since you insist on a trashing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:08 AM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Yeah, yeah, I know there was a Socialist Party and still is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:23 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. I think we're done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:27 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. 1912 is another example. And Greens still tries to defeat Wellstone and Lamont. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. It actually has the desired effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:47 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Is that why Nader got 3% of the vote in 2000 and less than 1% in 2004? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. Think WHIG... oh wait that means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:09 AM Response to Reply #51 |
55. The Whigs were suffering staggering electoral losses; Democrats aren't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:15 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. And who is talking of democrats? Oh wait all is about the democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:09 AM Response to Reply #57 |
60. Not really since the parties back then were largely centered around regional concerns. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
50. SEIU is connected with the charter school movement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:52 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. I just report what I heard on the tweet show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC