|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:29 AM Original message |
Any Other Hawks Here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. I'm with you. I'll note that the military has been socially progressive while the civilian world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brickbat
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
2. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. I have always wondered how strong is strong enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:42 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. we could slash spending and STILL have the most "kick-ass" army, if we got rid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
4. How strong do you want it to be? Strength at the expense of domestic programs is no victory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. i think we could cut a ton of spending and still have the strongest military, if we were to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. and 95% of our overseas bases, which serve no purpose but to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:49 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. According to THEIR figures! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dogtown
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #8 |
44. And the Soviets spent themselves into collapse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
7. While I support a strong military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
9. I sure ain't no pacifist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boomerbust
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
10. No unrec here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:17 AM Response to Original message |
11. I consider myself a Scoop Jackson Democrat, to a limit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
12. Henry Scoop Jackson is the hero to Neocons like Wolfowitz, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
31. It's is disgusting that Scoop Jackson -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Obamanaut
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:30 AM Response to Original message |
14. The US can have a strong military - at home in the US. Close the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
15. so,enlist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:16 AM Response to Reply #15 |
24. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:01 PM Response to Reply #15 |
49. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman2
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
16. An empire is diminished every time it projects force. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bigmack
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
17. We can't afford it! Simple... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
18. K&U |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
19. Detonate a nuclear bomb in NK? Really? What do you think that might do to SK? And... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
20. Well there is nothing you say all that far from me but not really a hawk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
21. Gotta keep the bogeyman of the week at bay by bankrupting the "home of brave" and killing people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Exactly! "War is a Racket" - But a strong military as a deterrent = good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
22. No. And you have been misled. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
miscsoc
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
23. I'm a crypto-hawk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
25. don't trust the russians? what sense is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
26. I don't trust the Russians OR the Chinese...i still have a hard time getting my head around.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
40. Iran? No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
27. Believing in a strong military doesn't make you "A Hawk." Some of us liberals believe in that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
29. Scoop Jackson? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:47 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Well said. Brief and accurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
32. You oppsed a war that was the DIRECT -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
33. Not a hawk and I trust the Russians to do exactly what is in their own self interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grand Taurean
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:52 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. And we are signing a new nuclear arms/materials control treaty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
34. Is this DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:59 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. "Troll." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:26 PM Response to Reply #34 |
45. Obvious troll is obvious. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grand Taurean
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
35. Scoop Jackson was a proud whore of the MIC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. He was the Joe Lieberman of his day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robdogbucky
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. I would not put the Senator from Boeing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
41. Can you answer two questions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Fair enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
42. Not where I sit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
43. "Defending our southern border" against what? Brown people? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
46. I'm a Carolina Chickadee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:34 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. and proud of it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 01:58 PM Response to Original message |
48. I'm something less than a "hawk" but more than a pacifist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
52. I hope you are lurking and enjoying a well-deserved... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Call Me Wesley
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
53. OP left the building, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Geeze, what took so long? That jerkoff was an obvious troll from day one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
54. "Let the unrecs fly!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
55. You're welcome to Scoop. He was the father of neoconservatism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
57. Tombstoned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:22 PM Original message |
good riddance. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marmar
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. What's sadder is all the agreement with Now Tombstoned in this thread.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
59. Scoop Jackson was a neocon, and the boss of the PNACers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
60. Dead Man Walkin'! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
61. Well, while you might distrust the Russians, by following your path, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC