|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:40 AM Original message |
Would Anita Hill be a suitable SCOTUS nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
1. She would be my first choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. Not likely to happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hayu_lol
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:47 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Put Anita on the same court as Clarence? ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. Nope, she's too old |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
5. I love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
6. sure. let thomas sit in institution for two decades, aquiring the power and strength and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:11 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. "The new gal?" It's the Supreme Court, not Mad Men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
7. Inhofe and Coburn are republican, they will say NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nevergiveup
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:56 AM Response to Original message |
8. It would be worth it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. You got that right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
9. She was my first thought days ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharesunited
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 09:30 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. And if they wanted to rehash the Thomas confirmation, that would be fantastic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage Inc.
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
12. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProgressiveProfessor
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
13. Why not Lani Guinier? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
15. It would never happen but the idea of watching their heads explode. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
16. The theatre alone would be great for a nomination! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
17. No but I'd love to be there when Clarence Thomas heard that idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
18. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC