|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:41 PM Original message |
Rachael Maddow, PhD is our generations' Edward Murrow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. She is great. It warmed my heart when I found out she had a PhD -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:55 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Yes, but we should not be ashamed when we are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:26 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. No we shouldn't -- that is where I probably will end up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. I will always love Olbermann, for he is highly comedic and was a lone voice throughout much of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. I love both of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. Edward R. Murrow- Not really, but Rachel certainly is very quick & clever-Someone I trust completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 03:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Actually, your description fits Murrow rather well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Then you haven't watched her show enough..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. She does use humor, but its in that "laugh because you can" sort of way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. 'Beautiful' to me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Not that's not cute, but her goofiness reflects our goofiness (we've become goofier since Ed) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think she's one of the best!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
9. Rachel is great, with or without Ph.D.! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Love the 666 Post count |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 11:19 PM Response to Reply #10 |
27. I missed that! Funny! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. You were. Now you're the oral-sex Antichrist. (669) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. SPRAYYYYYYYYY!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. I hope it was just water and not hot chocolate! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindandSoul
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
42. You don't miss a thing, do you??? LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
11. You are absolutely right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnArmyVeteran
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. How about a 'Who is Rachel's Biggest Fan Contest'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Who cares who her biggest fan is? I just know I can get the truth from her and no one else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
18. Rachel Murrow? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 04:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
22. It would be better if she was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. She does have enough to make a real difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. Olbermann CLEARLY fancies himself as a latter-day Murrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yeah, but better a latter-day Murrow than a latter-day Coughlin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Fri Apr-16-10 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
26. Totally agree! She is the best there is. She not only tells the whole story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib_wit_it
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 03:33 AM Response to Original message |
28. She's the best! But, um, sorry, but I must point out--it's "our generation's" Edward Murrow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. Hey man! I'm GenX - we get to claim her!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib_wit_it
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:34 PM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Precisely why you need "generation's" not "generations' " to show ownnership by a single generation, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Argh... must... stifle...urge.. .to... bonk...grammar. ..nazi...on... head...with..fishes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib_wit_it
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 09:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Yeah, I know. I have a lot of fish-shaped bruises. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 08:55 AM Response to Reply #41 |
46. DearGOD, the APOSTROPHES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik
![]() |
Sun Apr-18-10 08:51 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. as a grammar nazi who *mostly* stifles it..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Juche
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 04:17 AM Response to Original message |
29. She is one of the best journalists I've seen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JNelson6563
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
30. She's great but too cutesy sometimes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
31. Yep - Oxford. Wiki says: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Bay Area repreSENT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brigid
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
35. I love Rachel! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
37. Girlfriend and staff do their homework. THEN: Ready... Aim... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 02:13 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Funny thing is she has fans on the right (who are afraid to admit it) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat Apr-17-10 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
44. love Rachel -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC