|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 07:04 PM Original message |
The executive order on abortion does not consider the health of a woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. that exec order changed exactly nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 06:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
35. That's the problem! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. What do you propose should be done about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eg-ptiangirl (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 07:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Why is abortion so important issue in your country? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 07:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Indeed, it should be very personal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #4 |
75. Republican's like govt. control over women, but not the banks? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I can't explain it any better than Skip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 08:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Because the Puritans came here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 09:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. It should be very personal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Because it concerns a woman's ability to have sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Are you saying women need abortion to be legal because it eases the consequences? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. It is not your choice to make. Men have taken it on themselves.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I don't know if this is news to you, but birth control methods all have a failure rate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 01:57 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Yes, I am aware of all of that and i stated also its a womens choice for the most part. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 10:22 AM Response to Reply #31 |
45. Abortion *is* birth control. I think you mean to say "instead of contraception." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #31 |
49. This "abortion as birth control" meme assumes that women get pregnant on purpose or through laziness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomRain (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 09:00 PM Response to Reply #49 |
69. just the sort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 07:27 AM Response to Reply #69 |
74. PLs will argue that such women can "just" have the baby and give it away |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 11:56 PM Response to Reply #49 |
81. not only is that meme anti-woman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. I don't know if this is news to you, but birth control methods all have a failure rate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 09:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
41. There are really only 3 reasons a late term abortion is ever performed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #41 |
59. Bravo--!!! Should be required reading -- K&R . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 11:58 PM Response to Reply #41 |
82. +1000. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 10:20 AM Response to Reply #23 |
44. Women need abortion to be legal in order to avoid death from illegal abortion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:28 PM Response to Reply #44 |
61. Nice post . . . and this is the stuff too rarely heard -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cstanleytech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 12:07 AM Response to Reply #44 |
72. I've not been saying otherwise but thanks for posting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 05:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. Because the majority of the people on the planet are female . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mithreal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 12:13 AM Response to Reply #16 |
30. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 03:03 PM Response to Reply #3 |
55. America is a nanny state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 08:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
67. Because it controls the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. Yes, Congress should absolutely pass a bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-17-10 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. 14 Pro-choice Dems attended the quietly done signing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n.michigan (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 05:42 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Gag me. Neo-Romans mascarading as representatives of the people (WOMEN). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 05:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. Marcy Kaptur should be ashamed . . . . and I like her most times . .!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 03:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
56. Payback for their votes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 01:05 AM Response to Original message |
9. Achieved at the expense of women. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
10. TN will try to ban abortions coverage. They claim exec order not enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
12. Of course not. Women's reproductive health has always been a card to be played. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
13. If abortion is murder, as anti-choicers claim, then the "rape or incest" exceptions allow murder. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
14. If the woman had carried her anacephalic to term, her insurance would have refused to cover |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 09:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
42. +1000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
62. + another 1000% -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unabelladonna (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
18. HYPOCRITES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flyarm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
19. Does this Exec order mean , if you as the Preg mother have cancer, insurance does not have to pay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
20. FYI, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 09:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Exactly. I've brought this up several times: what effect does Obama's executive order have on Hyde? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. As far as I can tell, it seems to mean that Hyde is enshrined. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
25. It is partially implied in "life of the woman" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 11:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 07:34 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. But isn't one's life in danger a part of one's health? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 10:30 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. The thing to do is keep politicians out of it. Let women make their decisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 11:17 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. But the politicians will always control the purse strings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 11:52 AM Response to Reply #47 |
48. That is not true. It really is no longer the woman's decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:31 PM Response to Reply #40 |
63. Notice that pregnant women lose the right to self-defense ...IF a fetus is involved -- !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
57. Yeah, those stooopid women don't know what's good for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 07:23 AM Response to Reply #25 |
73. Depends on the health issue, and the "chances" of survival |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmileyRose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-18-10 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
28. So much for medical care being between us and our doctor........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoeyTrib (215 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 02:17 AM Response to Original message |
32. Totally sucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RBitt (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:11 AM Response to Original message |
33. just wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
feslen (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 06:24 AM Response to Original message |
34. so I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
36. Republicans tend to oppose "health of the mother" exceptions because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 07:05 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Now so do Democrats apparently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 07:23 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Oh come now, MF. Everyone knows that the best way to fight right-wing extremism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 07:31 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Oh, yeh. Neville himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n.michigan (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. The best way to fight RW extremism is LEFT WING EXTREMISM! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
65. Dem take on "bipartianship" . . . do what the Repugs want you to do -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #36 |
64. Agree . . . and I'd add that they are generally against women acting in their own interests--!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
43. too late to Rec...kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
50. Could women get some consideration if we formed a giant corporation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 08:40 PM Response to Reply #50 |
68. That's a very interesting idea.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
51. Here's another kick. Too late to rec. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
branders seine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
52. The chocolate ration has been increased! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ehrnst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
53. SCOTUS - bans must make exemptions for health of the woman. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 05:26 PM Response to Reply #53 |
60. Not last I heard. Here's a link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
66. So women have to put their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomRain (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 09:25 PM Response to Original message |
70. rape or incest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-19-10 09:41 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. I tried to research that, but what I found make me sick inside. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
76. Your title reads: The executive order on abortion does not consider the health of a woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Her life and "health" are 2 different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izzybeans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. see my edit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-20-10 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
79. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-21-10 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
80. k n r |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC