|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
cynatnite
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:01 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should the Fairness Doctrine be brought back? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. I'd love to know WHY someone would vote no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. I voted yes, but the Fairness Doctrine never applied to cable anyway |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
38. actually, the FCC did include the FD in its rules for cable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
50. Ah ... but the fairness doctrine could cover it. It's a matter of political will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. It's sort of ironic that you are taking such an aggressive tone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:17 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. aggressive? For asking WHY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. You're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:20 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Deleted message |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. zipplewrath summed it up well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:24 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. Deleted message |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Shadows? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:19 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. okay -- that's a good point. That was my whole purpose of asking why. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. I'd love to know WHY someone would think that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Deleted message |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. And yours? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:29 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. Ed Schultz went into it the other night - 90% of the radio waves has conservative talk radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
41. I'd venture a bet that 90 percent is a huge exaggeration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. he was talking about talk radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
52. saying 90 percent of talk radio is conservative is a much different thing than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. that's what he was saying. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #27 |
83. Not it the larger context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
26. Its not asking why that is the problem, it is how it was asked, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoNothing
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I don't see how that would be remotely constitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:23 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Was it unconstitutional the first time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. It was only federally regulated public airwaves last time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I don't think the internet needs to be involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Fox is on cable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. You may be right about the legality, but the net effect is a disaster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Perhaps... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. You're right. Nobody believes Fox. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:48 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Which in the circle of life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:49 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Not according to your understanding of what's constitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:54 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Huh? My understanding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:59 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. While I hate to borrow a right-wing talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:04 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. If it's not constitutional, it's not constitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. You may enjoy our final slide into Orwellian disinformation and dystopia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:10 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. What would make you say such a thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:24 PM Response to Reply #48 |
56. If you believe that the Constitution enforces the destruction of America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #56 |
62. Really? How petty do you want to get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:34 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. I haven't been going after you at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Defending and discussing are two completely different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:11 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. I have no problem borrowing from a progressive talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
54. How would it "not be constitutional" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. by your reasoning, newspapers and the internet could be regulated as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daylan b
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. Have you read a summary of the Red Lion case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoNothing
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Corporate media already disseminates info based on their business interests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. With this court, neither do I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. oh jayzus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 07:59 AM Response to Reply #37 |
84. Actually, I haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 12:54 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. among other things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 01:15 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. One of the excesses to which I refered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 01:36 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. i wasn't referring to the EU as a central authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 01:43 PM Response to Reply #87 |
88. It ain't all that limited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 01:47 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. that's where we disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 02:08 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. A combination of things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 02:16 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. well yes. you are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Well, until Wheat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 02:37 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. it is definitely a classic example of two things i despise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. What we really need is for our airwaves not to be polluted with 24/7 propaganda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. I Never Hide In The Shadows On This Issue...It's Not "Fairness"...It's Acess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
66. what is a "conventional radio" station? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:21 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. Definition: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #74 |
95. while much, if not most conservative radio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 12:29 AM Response to Reply #95 |
100. The Equivelency Game... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 01:57 AM Response to Reply #100 |
101. i agree with what you say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 10:53 PM Response to Reply #74 |
96. so we agree that 90 percent of "conventional" radio is not rw talk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 12:19 AM Response to Reply #96 |
99. Billy Tauzin Ran The Show... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:24 PM Response to Reply #22 |
75. Few people understand how these policies were implemented, thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluethruandthru
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 01:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
90. You're absolutely right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ter
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 07:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
78. Because it's not the government's job to enforce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
4. Both "sides" of the same Corporate Story doesn't cut it either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. After REAGAN the saint of the GOP deleted it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
28. the pro-corporate types would rather see corporations disseminating whatever info they want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoNothing
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:33 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. There's an actual matter of principle you know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. No - not every issue has two rational sides. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:01 PM Response to Reply #30 |
43. Yes, I do want them to have equal time and to out themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:16 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. the FD didn't require "equal" time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:20 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. A thousand cuts is how we got exactly *here* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gleaner
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
32. I voted yes .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
39. The fairness doctrine really isn't the problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
53. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
69. God, that would be wonderful! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr Morbius
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:30 PM Response to Reply #39 |
76. YES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:03 PM Response to Original message |
44. I'm afraid it would just purpetuate the Postmodernist relativist "that's just your opinion" thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:27 PM Response to Reply #44 |
59. Yes. Conservatives have used the idea of "balance" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spike89
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
57. I voted no because it isn't a solution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:25 PM Response to Original message |
58. No. We don't need government regulation of speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 04:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
70. You think more wealthy owners will produce news that wont be aimed at making them wealthier? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Its only censorship now because a few companies control all information outlets, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oregone
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:19 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Information is being presented to boost the diverse portfolios of owners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 08:16 PM Response to Reply #73 |
81. Right. And... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hubert Flottz
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
67. HELL... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guitar man
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
68. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nemo137
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
72. I voted no because media consolidation is a much greater problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onestepforward
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
77. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BreweryYardRat
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
79. HELL YES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NecklyTyler
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
80. The Fairness Doctrine is not about shutting up the right wingers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Wed Apr-21-10 08:24 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Hannity and Colmes coming up next, followed by |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
97. Until you find a large audience that cares about what's true and what's not.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moondust
![]() |
Thu Apr-22-10 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
98. It *might* inhibit some of the nonstop lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
102. Stern moved from broadcast to satellite. And, he was cheered for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DailyGrind51
![]() |
Fri Apr-23-10 06:06 AM Response to Original message |
103. Five years ago, I might have said "No", but not anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC