http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/mobiles/lost-iphone-flap-deepens-as-police-actions-questioned-20100428-tr2g.html"... The controversy surrounding the raid {on Gizmodo editor's house} has deepened after it emerged that
Apple sits on the steering committee of the Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team (REACT) taskforce, which was responsible for the raid on Chen's house.The Santa Clara County District Attorney's office told Yahoo! News in a statement that Apple provided the taskforce with "advice, recommendations, strategic input and direction", but
the extent of the company's involvement in the Gizmodo raid is not yet clear...Matt Zimmerman, spokesman for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the raid on Chen's house was unlawful because reporters such as Chen were protected from police searches aimed at uncovering confidential sources and seizing other information developed during newsgathering activities.'"
------------------------
You just can't make this stuff up.
I would hope that Zimmerman's view prevails in the courts: Certainly do not like the idea that private companies can use the State Police as their own private rent-a-cops. That was all too common in this country in up until the 1960s.
I was on the verge of buying an iPhone, but I now see Apple as a company with totalitarian values and am going with (the more costly out-of-pocket) Palm Pre Plus (in spite of its stupid name).