Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With the decision today by the Supreme Court allowing the memorial cross on Federal land

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:10 PM
Original message
With the decision today by the Supreme Court allowing the memorial cross on Federal land
just Wait you'll see the Fundies start a campaign to erect crosses everywhere on Federal lands. Or you'll see them erected in the dark of night and then there will be immense problems trying to get them taken down,


MARK MY WORDS


http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2010-04-28-mojave-cross_N.htm


A deeply divided Supreme Court revived congressional efforts Wednesday to permit a wooden cross erected in the Mojave National Preserve more than 75 years ago to remain on the park grounds.
By a 5-4 vote, the justices reversed a lower court decision that had invalidated a federal law designed to let the cross remain, in the face of a challenge that it constituted a government endorsement of religion.

The decision does not reinstate the law but returns the case to the lower court and strengthens the government's hand to allow crosses and other religious symbols on public grounds.


TENSE ARGUMENTS: Justices divided over cross on park land
CASE LOG: Major cases facing the Supreme Court
FULL COVERAGE:Latest from the Supreme Court

"Although certainly a Christian symbol, the cross was not emplaced on Sunrise Rock to promote a Christian message," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote of the cross that was put up in 1934 by the Veterans of Foreign Wars to commemorate U.S. soldiers who died in World War I. "Rather, those who erected the cross intended simply to honor our nation's fallen soldiers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Been there that long. Leave it alone. /nt (BTW: Atheist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. This Atheist
agrees this goes a bit far. Leave the thing alone. Let's concentrate on stuff that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Except it won't stop there
They now have their foot in the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. A cross today...a Burning Cross Tomorrow !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. why would a cross
honor our fallen soldiers if it has no religious significance?

This is a bullshit decision, as usual from the Roberts court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good thing no Jews died in that war...
Only Christian soldiers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or Atheists, what about them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. It's a five foot tall painted white pipe in the shape of a cross, on a road that doesn't see a
handful of cars every week. I can see how this could be construed as the heavy hand of the government leading the unfaithful to Christ... not. It's actually private property.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. There are PLENTY of venues to spread the Word of God in this day and age
federal land shouldn't be one of them.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. "It's actually private property." Only because they got caught!
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkie Brewster Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. There were no atheists in WWII
If they were, they converted instantly in the fox hole.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hi, it isn't what you think at all. Bye.
Bob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Hi I am a Christian, and I think it is what I think it am....
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shedevil69taz Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess you could classify me an athiest
but if that cross has been up this long there's no reason to take it down now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onceuponalife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. Sorry, but your reply makes no sense
What does length of time have to do with anything? There is no statute of limitations on the Constitution.

And learn how to spell atheist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wonder what the Court
and fundies would have to say if, instead of a cross, it was a crescent moon or star of David.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. So even if it has history, it needs to come down?
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 02:51 PM by Rex
What about all the gargoyle statues I've seen on old state/federal buildings!? Are they endorcing unicorns and dragons as well now? I can't believe my taxpayer dollar goes towards the gummit supporting wizards and trolls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. so a violation of the Constitution is okay
so long as it's got some history behind it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well explain then why we 'swear to tell the truth' on a Bible in a courtroom
and then maybe I will take this kind of stuff seriously. Until then, expect me not so much to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. custom
And you can choose not to, as I did the last time I was "sworn in". The President isn't required to swear on a Bible when he's sworn in, either.

Separation of church and state is a line that shouldn't be crossed. I oppose every bit of crossing whenever it comes up. The religious right is trying desperately to tear down the wall, and, sadly, the courts are going along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Sorry, but I think we never established a seperation so I can't really
get mad over something like this. In God we Trust (on all our money), God bless America...etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Onceuponalife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson disagree
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 01:45 AM by Onceuponalife
and I think they know a smidgeon more about it than you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Whatever
I disagree with their views, but that is just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder what all the Jews who fought in that war think. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. this court is hell-bent on dissolving the separation between church & state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. what do you expect from a court dominated by consrvative Catholic theocrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. And that's the point of it all.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Llewlladdwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. Y'all do know the cross is on private property, right? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. That's actually what the SC case was about. Not about the cross, but whether Congress acted
Edited on Wed Apr-28-10 04:08 PM by cherokeeprogressive
unconstitutionally by deeding the land underneath the cross to the VFW.

Who cares what the facts are though; the mere sight of a cross incites much wailing and gnashing of teeth in some Americans.

All this over a 5'8" piece of pipe, painted white, on a road that doesn't see 10 cars a day. How underhanded of those VFW types in 1934 to subject the scorpions, lizards, and coyotes to the heavy hand of government, leading them to Christ.

I say let the Muslims, Buddhists, Jews, Rastafarians, Frisbeetarians, and whoever else claims Sunrise Rock as their own build whatever the hell they want there. So 10 cars a day can see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. you do know it didn't start out as "private property," right?
i doubt congress would deed the land to me if i put up a pentagram or
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toasterlad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-28-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. I Guess I Can Finally Go Out And Paint Pentagrams All Over National Parkland.
It's my way of honoring the troops who are doing the work of my lord satan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:05 AM
Response to Original message
32. Wow. That quote from Justice Kennedy is pretty clueless.
And there's that 5-4 count once again. The legacy of too many Republican presidents' Court appointments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC