Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans fold like a cheap suit...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:02 AM
Original message
Republicans fold like a cheap suit...
After all their bluster and Frank Luntz talking points, the Republicans finally surrendered on the financial reform debate. For three days, they had illusions they could do the same trick they did with healthcare reform. They all held hands and voted against debating anything about Wall Street reform.

But, in the end, they decided to cut their losses and stop blocking the debate. They still don't want it but it was a political bomb waiting to blow up in their faces, and a few of them knew it. So they folded.

Now, today, they are attempting to spin it as if that was their plan all along. They were simply trying to get the Democrats to compromise with a few of their ideas. :-) These people are as fake as a three-dollar bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Republican principles can be beaten by the threat of a cot
hence their principles are not even cot-worthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. They were simply trying to get the Democrats to compromise?
Why in the world would we even listen to the Cons' suggestions?

The Cons drilled and dug this hole we are in.

And they keep asking us to continue digging with them?

Just ignore them and lead us up and out, Dem leaders. Up and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wish they had persevered a while longer.
Their agenda was transparent:
1) Obstruct all Democratic action
2) Protect the Money Changers

DELAY DELAY DELAY

THREE FUCKING DAYS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. When they filibuster the bill before the final vote it will look worse for them. It will be seen as
more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I would be surprised...
if they came back to get their asses kicked again. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
601Liberal Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. I hope they keep filibustering
A part of me with they would. Not that I'm opposed to reform (I favor it strongly), but it would really make people think twice about voting Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Read the article in the Washington Post
it certainly reads that way. It is making them the heroes trying to reform Wall Street and the Banks. This is the news the people get no wonder they think Democrats are causing all the trouble.

I will say this we have one of the most crooked, corrupt, partisan media organizations in the world. They are so up the republican butt they are falling all over them selves to give them best status. AND IT IS THE DEMOCRATS FAULT. ALL THE HAD TO DO WAS REINSTATE THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thank you for calling them on it...
Most folks know the truth when they see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The Fairness Doctrine would never be applied to the Washington Post. How could it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC