Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did George Bush receive an honorary knighthood in 2003?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:32 PM
Original message
Did George Bush receive an honorary knighthood in 2003?
Edited on Fri May-04-07 09:33 PM by Venus Dog


This from a September 23, 2003 White House Press Conference with Scott McClellan

Q: Scott, a few questions, please, on the international troops to Iraq, any more international troops. Is there a deadline? Is there any financial incentives for these countries to join? And on your statement about the state visit to the United Kingdom, you mentioned President Reagan's visit when he received an honorary knighthood. Is President Bush about to receive an honorary knighthood?

MR. McCLELLAN: You might want to talk to United Kingdom. I don't know what their plans are in terms of all the details of the state visit.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=61166 (scroll 3/4 way down)

George H.W. Bush received an honorary knighthood (not sure of year)
Americans who have received honorary knighthoods include former New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, Steven Spielberg and former presidents George Bush and Ronald Reagan.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2328763.stm

These stories being put out about how George is taking etiquette lessons and having to be convinced to wear a tuxedo for the Queen's visit are all BULLSHIT people! The corporate media is pushing the image of how Lord Hissyfit is so "downhome". Bush has worn a tux on many occasions - just look on Google images. SHEEESH!

Junior was born in New Haven, CT - not Texas and he attended private boarding schools in Connecticut his entire life. Do you really think Ma Bush would let her little darlings be raised in such a bodunk place as Texas! Let's get real people!





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. He received the "Order of Eat my Garter" n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He's also the recepient of
the Royal Nuthood 1st Crass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's a crappy list of Americans who havve received Knighthoods
Confirms for me where the royal families politics lay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They don't choose who gets knighthoods
The government does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thanks for the info
I was unaware of that.
I thought the Royal Family in Consultation with the House of Lords did that.
I stand corrected

I've learned something new today.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. There's a couple of minor orders like the Royal Victorian
given for personal service to the monarch which the government doesn't care about. Otherwise, they're political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sir Dumb Ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is That Constitutional
Article 1, Section 9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. No it is not constitutional. Thank you for understanding my point here!
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. They are honorary knighthoods, not actual ones
Clinton received one, too, as did Guiliani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. American citizens can accept an honorary knighthood from a nation
with which the US has diplomatic relations. They may wear the insignia; service members are required to wear it on their uniform. They may display a knight's coat of arms. They cannot use the title in any official capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. To be able to wear it on a service uniform IS an official capacity
And the Constitution states "title of any kind whatever" - be it honorary or otherwise. We wonder why these people act like they are above the law and it is for this very reason - they believe themselves to be specially ordained by God - exactly what monarchies inherently believe. I thought this was one of the great motivating principles behind the American Revolution - to banish the monarchy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Note the consent of Congress clause
And a knighthood, honorary or otherwise, is not a grant of nobility. And again, to use the title in an official capacity. When Colin Powell wears his greens with the knighthood badge tucked somewhere in the fruit salad, that doesn't make him General Sir Colin Powell.

The founders put that article in the USC to prevent the development of a hereditary peerage in this country which it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meldroc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll call him a lot of names, but "sir" isn't one of them. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Downhome is one thing - sort of like being a "regular guy"
and maybe my definition of a regular guy is different from other people's. But the regular guys I know know when they need to dress up (even if they don't like it) and they know not to chew with their mouths open and they would know to behave like a civilized human being if they ever met the Queen of England. If nothing else, they'd behave decently just because most "regular guys" were raised to treat an elderly person with respect.

Bush is just coming off like the Neanderthal he is and showing what a poor upbringing he had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. I think they are having to convince him to wear a tux
I heard he wants to wear his "Commander Guy" costume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. I still think he's an asshole, no matter how he's dressed...
Clothes DO NOT make the man. There has to be a man to fill out the clothes.

I thought he had worn a tux before, but it seems to me, it is still a bun w/o the hotdog...x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Sir Junior, Lord of Smirkington, Earl of Chucklenutz
An inbred New England Royal Chimptard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-04-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Exactly. He is certainly no Texan - it was all staged for the hoopleheads!
George W. Bush spent his childhood between the Bush homes in New York, Long Island and Connecticut; the family compound at Kennebunkport, Maine; the 10,000-acre plantation in South Carolina; and the island retreat in Florida, where their neighbors were Doubledays, Fords, Roosevelts and Vanderbilts.

"He may have a lifestyle of a Texan, but George W. is a social register Greenwich boy," says Roberts. Certainly, when it comes to American politics, there is a dynastic process at work here. It would appear that the political system often rewards the candidates who have DNA advantages in the form of a respected family name. Whether this tendency also serves to undermine the ideal of representative government open to all, however, is a matter for debate.


http://archive.salon.com/politics2000/feature/2000/03/31/bush/print.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venus Dog Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-05-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC