Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WARNING: Reading this NYT article could make you "stupid"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:48 PM
Original message
WARNING: Reading this NYT article could make you "stupid"
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 05:49 PM by Jeffersons Ghost

The Defense of Computers, the Internet and Our Brains
By NICK BILTON

If you’re reading this blog post on a computer, mobile phone or e-reader, please stop what you’re doing immediately. You could be making yourself stupid. And whatever you do, don’t click on the links in this post. They could distract you from the flow of my beautiful prose and narrative. This is the alarm currently being rung by some in the bell towers of technology.

There is a lively discussion and some concern that computers, the Internet and multitasking are extracting a mental price. Nicholas Carr argues in his book “The Shallows,” that the Internet, computers, Google, Twitter and the like, are making us into shallow thinkers and the neurocircuitry of our brain that long form reading creates is critical for society to function. Mr. Carr thinks that the Web, with its colored hypertext and endless abyss of bite-sized morsels of information, is making us stupid.

And although there are plenty of others in this camp, there are some who argue that not only are our brains just fine on the Internet, but they are indeed better off for it.
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/in-defense-of-computers-the-internet-and-our-brains/?ref=technology
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:49 PM
Original message
No link?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. link?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. thanks I caught it on edit...
reading it must have made me too stupid to put in a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. These guys had to put much more infornation into this offering to make it
"commercial." I'm not complaining, I love the studio version. But somehow the tempo and simplicity of this recording are more compelling, at least to one who was afforded those luxuries.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA6jfvP1uko
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Stoopid? I no UR but wut m I? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Boring!
Next!

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Horseshit
The first thing they teach in newspaper journalism is to sum everything up in the first paragraph because most readers never make it past that first group of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. actually, it's called a "shotgun lead"...
It has origins in the US Civil War. And the reason it contained as much information as possible was because journalist needed to get the news out before the opposition cut the telegraph wire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I did not know that
However, I stand by my statement that most readers never make it past the first paragraph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. that's probably why the lead - steeped in history - is still in use today...
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 06:02 PM by Jeffersons Ghost
In newspaper you're instructed to write something a sixth-grader can understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I'll go further
Most readers never make it past the headline.

When referencing the inattention of the general newspaper-reading public I'll always refer to that scene in the film All the President's Men:

The Washington Post editors are holding a daily editorial meeting. Each editor fights to have their chosen articles printed on the front page, above the fold. The foreign editor, portrayed by the wonderful John McMartin, pushes for a human interest piece on how a series of storms in the Philippines were being blamed on the theft of a statue of Jesus. The other editors snicker and comment on the repetitiousness of 'crazy' articles. The Foreign editor then says:

"Laugh. Laugh, gentlemen. It'll be the only story everyone reads."

That line is an unfortunate truth. We may bemoan our lazy press but we are hypocrites when we fail to recognize the short attention span of the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually listening to Limbaugh and Beck is what makes you lose IQ points
But listening to Thom Hartmann and Rachel Maddow can restore those points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. The media don't like the internet because they have no control over it.
We're not buying newspapers and gluing ourselves to our TV sets, and trusting the national news media any longer.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. That was heavy. I need a lolcats break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is the same sour grapes you hear from people regarding any new
technology or advances in society. It use to be things like, "The steam engine will never be replaced.", "CD's will replace vinyl?",
"Rock and roll will lead to sin!", (well that's close.), "Watching TV will make you go blind and ruin your brain." and on and on.
People that never read never do and the more intelligent will always read, write, photograph and contemplate. The naysayers make there living nay saying and life goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. He's a business writer. The neuroscientists interviewed all disagree.
I'm gonna go with the neuroscientists.

I think the real insight here is that you can always sell lots of books if you claim the latest new development in our culture is making our kids stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. internet good......stupidness bad..... its a no brainer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
18. Computers and the Internet making people stupid?
.
.
.
.
.
....Well,
maybe Twitter and Facebook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC