|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:21 AM Original message |
So Keith, Rachel and Thom all think that Obama's speech was weak.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Just because they think his speech was weak doesn't men they don't support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. i disagree with them about the speech,but why everyone is getting so worked up about it is beyond me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
2. If Obama speech had included everything he wanted to say..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:26 AM Response to Original message |
3. Well, given that I watched the speech, didn't listen to the pundritry, and can think for myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
4. I stopped listening to Hartmann ages ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:23 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. After Tuesday night, I n longer have any reason to watch Keith or Rachel n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:31 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Oh c'mon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:35 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I've no reason t turn them on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:37 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Suit yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
27. Deleted message |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:51 AM Response to Reply #14 |
28. Because he only want to hear from people who validate his preconceived notions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:30 AM Response to Original message |
5. I watch the speeches myself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
6. I thought the speech was so-so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
7. yes I trust them . . . they are allowed their opinions . . . and I hardly think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:37 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I trust them because in the past, their views reflect mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
8. The GOP wanted the taxpayers to foot the bill. Thats something they should be talking about. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stuart G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
9. I believe that the speech was weak too, but are Obama's actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wizstars (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #9 |
31. "Let Obama be Obama" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
10. I don't believe they were wrong to say the speech was weak--I thought it was, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkansas Granny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
11. Obama's speech was weak. It has nothing to do with trusting Keith, Rachel and Thom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
34. well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samplegirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
13. Sadly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
17. Oh dear fucking god, who cares |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:38 AM Response to Original message |
21. I don't base my opinions on pundits NOR do I trust politicians and their staff to be objective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 08:42 AM Response to Original message |
22. It was a weak speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DirkGently (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
23. The speech was weak, and the actions inconsistent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
24. Obama is still advocating for offshore drilling, nuclear power and another disaster, so I'm with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:28 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. You are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berry Cool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
25. I don't have to take sides. Only children think it's necessary to choose one side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
29. I'm fine with those three telling Obama they want more from him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
30. OK what has been accomplished |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
32. What the knee-jerkers don't realize is that Keith and Rachel are STRONG Obama supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-17-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
33. Co Presidents Olberman, Maddow and Hartman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC