|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:36 PM Original message |
Why would we spy on Quakers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal In Texas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. 'Cause they're just so darn...odd. We gotta keep an eye on 'em. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. we have known a draft was coming since all the draft board positions were filled several years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AzDar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Shhhhh, they've got the OATS, man. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tanyev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Barbara's never forgiven them for using her picture on those boxes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brer cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. lol!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. To find out how the sneaky bastards make them oats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Well I have to admit...somewhat sheepishly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I wonder if they would plaster it down with Vitalis like they do with their own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
6. They're too quiet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muntrv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. 'Cuz quakers look more like George Washington than Bush does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tin Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
9. Cause everyone else (i.e. people with phones and internet) are EASY to monitor... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elaineb (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-31-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
28. You might be confusing the Quakers with the Amish |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. Because Quakers want to wage peace, and that is definetely dangerous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cabcere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:07 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. That's got to be it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sweetheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. silence is suspicious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scytale888 (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:54 PM Original message |
Think as I do what out exception |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
13. WE as in most Americans wouldn't, however those in the Bush Administration would. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bananas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. It's more than that - they have a long history of activism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. because they have one of the nations oldest, most effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forrest Greene (946 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. That's Certainly Possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'm sure they're monitoring every little gathering of our local |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
20. Because they are the ones that even an old agnostic.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nutmegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:19 PM Response to Original message |
21. Because they're either with us, or the "terra-ists". [n\t] |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
China_cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
22. Leftover lessons from Nixon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:53 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Mmm, Nixon was a Quaker, albeit not a particulary good one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
23. They started the last peace movement.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wiley50 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-30-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
24. Watch Out For Those Quakers when They're Feelin' Their Oats n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-31-07 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
26. Quakers are dangerous! They don't want wars, and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-31-07 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
27. OMD? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC