I would imagine many of us are in the process of no longer believing in the old idea of America. The reality seems a little harsher than one might have hoped. "Where I Was From" is a great book. Thanks for the post.
http://www.bookforum.com/archive/fall_03/suro.html<edit>
I mention all this because unless you know how Didion used to write about California, it's difficult to make sense of the way she writes about the state in her new book, Where I Was From, a curious blend of memoir, reportage, and historical speculation. For although it contains some of her most trenchant writing on California, including a sharp account of the state's tortured relationship to the railroads in the nineteenth century and the federal government in the twentieth, if you come to this book expecting to get a picture of California in all its blooming confusion, you will be disappointed. Didion writes about small-town residents convinced that economic salvation is just around the corner (perhaps in the form of a new prison), middle-class engineers whose jobs are disappearing, and farmers clinging to an imaginary past. But she has little to say about property-tax revolts, recall elections, immigration, race, or even Silicon Valley. But that's how it should be, because Where I Was From is not, in fact, a book about California. It's a book about Didion's old idea of California, and how she stopped believing in it. The title "Where I Was From" (as opposed to, say, "Where I Came From") gives this away, as if Didion were saying she is no longer a native daughter. Throughout the book, she deconstructs the mythology of California that she grew up on and that she herself obliquely propagated in her earlier books, the mythology of pioneer toughness, frontier independence, and that "finest hour" that had supposedly been outlived. She reads her own first novel, Run River, diagnosing its "tenacious (and, as I see it now, pernicious) mood of nostalgia." She shows how California's supposedly self-reliant farmers, the ones who in Frank Norris's The Octopus stood up to the railroads and challenged speculators, were themselves speculators (if failed ones) whose entire wealth was dependent on the railroads to begin with. The heirs of those farmers, meanwhile, would come to depend for their livelihood on massive water subsidies underwritten by taxpayers. As for that wagon-train morality, Didion has come to see that crossing the Sierras "might not after all be a noble odyssey, might instead be a mean scrambling for survival." The pioneers did not always try to retrieve their casualties. Sometimes they left the sick and weak behind in order to make it through. Perhaps California was built not on toughness but on ruthlessness. And, as Didion asks, "When you jettison others so as not to be 'caught by winter in the Sierra Nevada mountains,' do you deserve not to be caught? When you survive at the cost of Miss Gilmore and her brother, do you survive at all?"
more...