Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could *you* handle this job?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:48 PM
Original message
Could *you* handle this job?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/19/technology/19screen.html?_r=2

Policing the Web’s Lurid Precincts

Ricky Bess spends eight hours a day in front of a computer near Orlando, Fla., viewing some of the worst depravities harbored on the Internet. He has seen photographs of graphic gang killings, animal abuse and twisted forms of pornography. One recent sighting was a photo of two teenage boys gleefully pointing guns at another boy, who is crying.

An Internet content reviewer, Mr. Bess sifts through photographs that people upload to a big social networking site and keeps the illicit material — and there is plenty of it — from being posted. His is an obscure job that is repeated thousands of times over, from office parks in suburban Florida to outsourcing hubs like the Philippines.

With the rise of Web sites built around material submitted by users, screeners have never been in greater demand. Some Internet firms have tried to get by with software that scans photos for, say, a large area of flesh tones, but nothing is a substitute for a discerning human eye.

The surge in Internet screening services has brought a growing awareness that the jobs can have mental health consequences for the reviewers, some of whom are drawn to the low-paying work by the simple prospect of making money while looking at pornography.

>more at the link above<





I'm really curious as to whether or not anyone thinks, honestly, they could handle this job.

I could handle the porn. I could handle some of the other crap. No way could I handle the kiddie porn and the criminal sexual behavior (S&M - even extreme - is not criminal sexual activity)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some days
I'm really happy to be naive and I want to stay that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Seconded!
I've seen victims of animal abuse and that makes me cry. I couldn't handle anything like that. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm afraid that would warp my mind way beyond what I could handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hate humanity enough as it is
that job would kill what spark of optimism remained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought that this was another one of those "Then you could be a DU moderator" posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think I could
not that I'd want to...

Seen a few things as a medic that would shock folks, including human trafficking and yes kids doing horrible things to kids... as well as victims of torture.

So being innocent and naive is not my thing any more and this all but shocks or surprises me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mokawanis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. I could not do that job
I don't care what it pays, I wouldn't do it. Looking at disturbing images all day is bound to cause anger, anxiety, depression, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Eating cockroaches sounds more agreeable.
Hell, I avoid the oil covered bird pictures from the gulf.

"Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof." I, sure as hell, don't want to go looking for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think I could
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I only mind porn when it's poorly done.
Edited on Tue Jul-20-10 01:57 PM by FormerDittoHead
:sarcasm: for the subject, the rest is serious:

No, I couldn't do it.

I once saw a picture of graphic "skat porn" (if you don't know, do NOT look it up - just move on) and it bothers me to this day.

A picture sometimes is worth more than 1,000 words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. It wouldn't be shocking, but it would be terribly depressing. I am glad there are people who feel
they are strong enough to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Are the illegal images forwarded to law enforcement?
I'm thinking of obvious animal and child abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Another question - has this stuff always been around and traded illicitly,
or did the Net bring a lot of people out of their holes and offer a market for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. This doesn't answer your question
Edited on Tue Jul-20-10 03:14 PM by Sal Minella
but the first time I saw this, I thought it hellaciously funny:

Edit: It's an animation of "Caveman Pornography" -- a cartoon showing how things might have been, long, long ago . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM2t_lso83E

I've read that pornographic photographs were being sold in Paris almost immediately after the invention of photography.

I have a hunch any new technology is going to be incorporated immediately into the world of pornography.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I agree it's alwways been around, I 'm just wondering if there isn't a hell of
a lot more of it. Just speculation, but I was in college when Deep Throat and Devil in Miss Jones came out. I think the second film played for an entire semester at the theater across from the campus. I didn't go to see them, but apparently a lot of people did. I later found out that some of my classmates ( this was Engineering school) took lunch at a near-by strip bar. Playboy was about to be displaced by Hustler.

So, sex wasn't invented with the Internet. On the other hand, my impression is that while most people my age took a peak at least once just to see what all the fuss was about, few dedicated as much time to it as so many men do today. (I understand there are women who enjoy porn, but my impression is that we're generally talking about males here.)

I'd say the net facilitates the production and distribution of a lot more "home-made" porn than there used to be.

Consider the old style flasher who had to stalk his prey one person or group at a time vs. today's exhibitionists who can host web sites or post links on Facebook and such.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's not a job for which I would apply, but those doing it most likely DID apply.
Discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. I could
But I wouldn't do so at "low pay."

I've dipped into the scum at the bottom of the internet more than a few times, and it's hard to think of anything that would be truly shocking.

The part that becomes shocking - and it's more a slowly growing pervasive sense of unease - is that someone dreamed this up, took the time to draw / photograph it, then someone else thought it was "cool" or "hot" and posted it in the internet, and then there's an audience who wants to look at it. The pictures themselves aren't shocking to me; I know what barbarisms people are capable of. it's the notion that there are people who derive joy from looking at the stuff that bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Myself, I like the "amateur" stuff
AKA, the neighbor's 40-something wife posing in the bedroom

I want realism (aka real people) in my porn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
18. nope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. No, I think it would be hard. Just reading about a boy crying while two others are pointing guns
at him disturbs me. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Call Me Wesley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. No, thanks.
And I do wonder about the people who apply to this job. And I'm not talking boobies on photobucket here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sounds like the NYT is ratcheting up the "kill net-neutrality" propaganda.
They've been blowing that dog whistle since 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. I am still haunted by that Chinese video of a man boiling a cat alive
Edited on Tue Jul-20-10 06:14 PM by Nay

and enjoying it. I could never do this job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. No, couldn't do it. I don't want to know how many sick people there are
out there. Next thing you know, I will be thinking every person on the street is a sociopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC