Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Millions More Fish Wash Ashore In Gulfport - "Not Yet Known If Oil Spill Was Factor"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:13 AM
Original message
Millions More Fish Wash Ashore In Gulfport - "Not Yet Known If Oil Spill Was Factor"
Edited on Sun Aug-01-10 08:25 AM by eowyn_of_rohan
I don't think this was posted - from July 20, WDSU - New Orleans News
http://www.wdsu.com/news/24323278/detail.html

Of course, the oil and dispersants probably have NOTHING to do with this...

GULFPORT, Miss. -- Something besides oil washed ashore along a section of beach in Gulfport this week.

Millions of small dead fish have washed ashore just east of Jones Park. The fish are believed to be menhaden.

Low oxygen levels in the water are typically to blame when large numbers of the tiny fish wash up dead, experts said. Harrison County leaders said it's too soon to tell if the fish-kill is related to the oil spill.

“If it’s oil-related, the BP contractors will have to pick it up,” Harrison County Sand Beach Director Bobby Weaver said. “If not, we’ll dispatch a county crew to come down here and get it."

By early Monday afternoon, sand beach crews started scooping up the dead fish and raking the sand. They were loaded on a dump truck and taken to the landfill.

GREAT! Without testing them for toxicity, they throw the poor fish in a landfill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. If low oxogen killed them could they really test for that??
Just asking .........

I know they test for oil on caught seafood by the nose test, but is there a test for corexit in seafood and humans??
I have never heard anything about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. seems they should be able to test for chemicals that compose Corexit
they didnt bother to do that before whisking them to a landfill. Not that that necessarily matters - I would imagine chemicals would still be present in their bodies, but I'm not sure about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Quickly disposing of problems limits legal liability.
The moral of this story seems to be that BP did not kill the fish because the county ended up cleaning up the beach.

A subtextual moral of this story is that small counties lack the clout to effectively prosecute BP.

"Virtue is a sin when devils are in charge."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. You Got It - Here is more on that
http://www.wlox.com/global/story.asp?s=12832436

"It might make sense to blame the oil spill for the fish kill or at least consider oil or dispersants in the water for the death of these pogeys. But Harrison County's sand beach director, isn't so sure.

"Probably a red tide. It's possible it could be something oil related. It's hard to say right now. DMR is going to send personnel out here to make that determination and it's important. If it's oil related, then the contractor for BP would be responsible for picking it up. If it's not, then we'll dispatch a county crew down here to get it," said Bobby Weaver.

...By early afternoon, sand beach crews began scooping up the dead fish and raking the sand.

The clean-up proceeded with the cause still unknown. DMR took several fish samples for testing. The test results will take at least a week. The dead fish in the sand were scooped off the beach, loaded onto a dump truck and taken to the landfill."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DMR made NO determination before having evidence taken to landfill, in effect, absolving BP from any blame or responsibility.

also from this article:
Dead menhaden have washed ashore on Harrison County's beach in recent years. But those kills were during fishing season, when nets were torn on a pogey boat. Right now, fishing is closed because of the oil.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. BINGO. .the faster the clean-up, the more likely that BP
could be held accountable, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. what oil spill? that's like yesterday's bad news....
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. yeah, it is really disturbing to me how this topic seems to be shunned around here
Edited on Sun Aug-01-10 09:32 AM by eowyn_of_rohan
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. As far as testing...
they must have done something because menhaden not fit for bait fishing (live ones) are generally used for fertilizer....at least around here. Why would they landfill them unless they were contaminated to the point of not being used for fertilizer? I say this also because rotten fish make great fertilizer, remember the tale of the Native Americans teaching the settlers to put 2 fish under the seeds they planted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Excellent point!!
I didn't even think of that :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Why would they send them to the landfill?
The Law of Supply and Demand, perhaps? Maybe nobody is interested in turning them into fertilizer? Maybe nobody wants to transport already-rotting fish to a fertilizer plant miles and miles away? And, considering many fertilizers are petrochemical derivatives, I doubt contamination is an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. To hide the evidence of contamination....
much like dumping truckloads of sand over tar on the beaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. It's all part of God's Plan...
Nothing to do with the spill...obviously...there's something much more Important afoot here! God told me whilst I was taking a shower...


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yeah, the major problems relating to the spill are behind us
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. Yeah, sure
Pay no mind to that oil leaking from the ocean floor... and come on down - eat fish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry Ogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not Yet Known If Oil Spill Was Factor...
Well then, we should remain totally aloof from reality and not jump to any conspiratorial theories or conclusions until the highly paid experts and information managers from BP determine that millions a few fish died do to some unknown factor that is totally unrelated to oil spills or the toxic chemicals used in the clean up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. This reminds me of the alewife die-offs in Lake Michigan in the 1960s
After sea lampreys were introduced to the great lakes, they killed off most of the salmon and lake trout that feed on the alewifes. Without predators eating them, the alewife populations exploded, and when they died, they just washed ashore--by the millions. Just like that photo. Those menhaden, which are very similar to alewifes, could have died as a result of the oil or the dispersant. Or, not. They could have just as likely died from low oxygen. The Gulf has a huge "dead zone", which is a dead zone due to low oxygen. Or, they could have had a population explosion, much like the alewifes in Lake Michigan, and they're now dying off. I prefer to let the facts come in before I jump to any conclusions about what caused this fish kill.

BTW, it only takes one fish to do toxicity tests. They don't need all of them. Meanwhile, I they supposed to leave them all on the beach to rot and stink?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. they were supposed to analyze fish BEFORE removing them from beach
To determine whether BP or the city/county was responsible for removing them.

They did NOT do that, and the city/county removed them, which in a sense absolved BP

They COVERED for BP - on their own? By order? From Whom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
18. totally natural
everyone knows fish sometimes get the blues and jump off underwater canyons like lemmings off of cliffs.

Jeez, you would think no one has ever seen a massive fish suicide before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. The food chain is breaking down. This is really bad news.
That image is haunting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. No problem.. they are just resting .. or pining for the fjords
Edited on Sun Aug-01-10 09:48 PM by SoCalDem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-10 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'll bet every one of those fish would
"like to have their life back."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. riiiiiiiiiiiiiight. How could the oil spill have ANYTHING to do with this????????
They think we are all idiots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D23MIURG23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hard to imagine how an oil spill could lead to low levels of oxygen in the Gulf...
Its not like this is a predicted effect of microbial degradation of dispersed oil, or anything like that.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Prolly just an Evil Spirit...
you'll have that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
25. What no tourist would eat solvent fish stew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
26. But it's all safe to eat dontcha know. n/t
Edited on Mon Aug-02-10 09:35 AM by Catherina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC