So much of journalism today resembles the hashing and re-hashing of the latest Frank Lutz talking points that it is refreshing to get some straight up analysis and fact:
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/28/tax-cut-truthiness/For my sins, I followed a link from Matthew Yglesias to Erick Erickson’s explanation of how great the Bush tax cuts really were. And there I learned some things I didn’t know:
* * *
Likewise, after the 2003 tax cuts, the unemployment rate fell to the lowest level since World War II. Let me repeat that: the Bush economic program created the lowest unemployment level ever.More um:
<
?&chart_type=line&graph_id=&category_id=&recession_bars=On&width=480&height=288&bgcolor=%23B3CDE7&graph_bgcolor=%23FFFFFF&txtcolor=%23000000&ts=8&preserve_ratio=true&fo=ve&id=UNRATE&transformation=lin&scale=Left&range=Custom&cosd=1960-01-01&coed=2010-06-01&line_color=%230000FF&link_values=&mark_type=NONE&mw=4&line_style=Solid&lw=1&vintage_date=2010-07-28&revision_date=2010-07-28&mma=0&nd=&ost=&oet=&fml=a>
The bit about unemployment really surprised me — after all, the incredibly good job market of the late 90s isn’t that far behind us.
But I think we have part of the key to how Republicans can believe that returning to the Bush agenda is exactly what we need: they’ve invented themselves an alternate history in which wonderful things happened under Bush, and earlier booms have been sent down the memory hole.