Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WaPo - "As deficit commission meets, Obama doesn't rule out new taxes" - OH NOES!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 02:34 AM
Original message
WaPo - "As deficit commission meets, Obama doesn't rule out new taxes" - OH NOES!
Let the misinformation begin! Some folks are saying that the President's refusal to rule out tax increases means that we will be getting a VAT next year! Others, such as the Nation, say that the end of Social Security is nigh! OMG! OMG!

The President has not ruled out turning people into Soyent Green as means of reducing the deficit, therefore that must also be in the offing! :crazy:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/27/AR2010042702275.html


President Obama said Tuesday that "everything has to be on the table" for a new commission examining the federal deficit, a position that raises the possibility that he could revisit the most expensive provisions of his new health-care law or backtrack on his pledge not to raise taxes for the middle class.

Speaking to reporters before the first meeting of the bipartisan commission, Obama warned that he would not answer questions about specific recommendations the panel might make.

"I'm not going to say what's in. I'm not going to say what's out. I want this commission to be free to do its work," he said.

In recent interviews, Obama and other administration officials have left the door open to tax increases, even for those earning less than $250,000 a year. The president has also explicitly agreed to consider changes to the hard-fought health-care law, said Alan K. Simpson, a former Republican senator from Wyoming who is serving as co-chair of the 18-member panel of lawmakers and presidential appointees.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here it is:
Edited on Mon Aug-02-10 02:48 AM by SunsetDreams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 02:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll just bookmark it and we'll take a look come December. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. A VAT has about as much chance of passing Congress as a single payer national health care system
It's a nice little idea for think tankers and economists to play around with for their own edification, but back here in the real world it is Dead Before Arrival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Damn It! What About Soylent Green? I Demand That President Rule It Out!!!
Edited on Mon Aug-02-10 09:27 PM by TomCADem
The President has not expressly ruled it out, so thus it is safe to conclude that it being considered by the deficit commission, and will form the cornerstone of deficit reduction strategy. We need to take a stand! It is made from people! People!!!!

<>

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. What does it say
that he put the health care law on the chopping block only weeks after it was passed and signed? The ink was barely dry.

I wonder which part of the health care law is on the chopping block - the benefits or the tax increases? Hard to believe the Catfood Commission will scale back the tax increases, since it's goal is to raise revenue. OTOH, federal spending under the law will consists almost entirely of insurance subsidies. So if something's going to be cut, it has to be the subsidies. Wonder what the recommended cut will be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-02-10 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd rather see an entire battery of new taxes
than change Social Security one iota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC