Do you, personally, think it is okay for Democrats to charge their own with malfeasance but ......

[Stinky The Clown]

..... lift not one finger to investigate repubicans?

The House ethics committee is about to charge two high profile, outspoken, very LIBERAL members of the Democratic Party and Black Caucus with various and sundry acts of malfeasance.

The various House committees - all controlled by the Democrats since 2006 - have thus far failed to even look into malfeasance against any significant repubican, even as anyone with an IQ above their hat size KNOWS crimes were committed.

Are YOU, personally, okay with that?

[juajen]

1. Hell, no!

[City Lights]

2. No! It infuriates me!

Everyone should be held to the same standard. And personally, I will never get over the fact that Junior and Dead-Zone Dick got away with their crimes.

[gateley]

3. No. It seems to be accepted that we're wimps except when it comes to our own.

Have to look strong (e.g. Rengel) but can't look as though we're on a partisan witch hunt (e.g. Ensign).

[daleanime]

4. But Stinky, if we went after all the 'malfeasance',

would we have anyone left in congress?:evilgrin:

Let's face it, about a 1/3 could be tossed automatically.

[Stinky The Clown]

5. If we want to eat our own, there are a few in the Senate who ought to be on the menu

DiFi, fer starters

[RaleighNCDUer]

9. And that would be a bad thing, how? nt

[daleanime]

10. Hmmm....

probably not!:bounce:

[rurallib]

6. I think they are letting FUX and the echo chamber set the agenda

If Roger Ailes suddenly got a bug to prosecute Bushco we'd see action tomorrow.
I think the Dems are being led by their fear of what the media says.

[Stinky The Clown]

Well ..... heh ....... that ought to come as no surprize.

It starts at the top and goes all the way down to the weakest of the weak.

[Iggo]

7. Yes and No.

See what happens when you ask two questions in one?

[Stinky The Clown]

8. But if one were to follow the "no" to its moral conclusion, there would be no need to ask ......

...... the first question.

[kenny blankenship]

11. Gotta let Republicans be Republicans

WE, on the other hand, must be above suspicion - suspicion by Republicans. If they smell something wrong, then investigations must be called. It's the only way we can expect them to meet us, in a spirit of bipartisanship and coming together, in the middle of their lair.

[daleanime]

14. Oh, my....

what a sharp knife you have Kenny.:wow:

[Hawkowl]

12. Democrats are destroying their own party

It appears to me to be a deliberate attempt by the corporate wing of the democratic party (including Obama) to marginalize the liberal wing of the party. I believe this will bring about the destruction of the democratic party as we know it.

[jgraz]

15. More Washington Generals shit

You gotta wonder if they really want to keep control of Congress.

[NoSheep]

13. No I do not think it's okay. I'm mad as hell about it.

[The Backlash Cometh]

16. Democrats are protective of their own.

The tipping point is when the Republicans smell blood. Once they decide to take someone down, Dems will put up very little fight, as they did when they decided to target Clinton. On the other hand, smart, crooked Dems usually get their hands dirty in something that high members of the Republican party are also involved with. They then have the Mexican stand-off they need to apply pressure to stop any investigations.

If you think our law enforcement agencies are independent or immune from political influence, think again.