honest question...why is m$nbc choosing not to show the press conference on the gulf oil?
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:31 PM
Original message |
honest question...why is m$nbc choosing not to show the press conference on the gulf oil? |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 12:32 PM by spanone
real news happening and they chose not to participate
curious
|
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |
1. My guess is: it is not bad news so no hysteria to foment... |
|
no hysteria = no ratings = no increased advertising dollars.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. bizarre, they talk shit all day and when real news is happening..... |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. now cnn stops their coverage to 'talk about it' |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 12:39 PM by spanone
they are going to continue to 'monitor it'
|
alsame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Mrs Greenspan's show is one that relies very heavily on |
|
guests and pre-taped reports. I think that's why they rarely break away to anything live, unless it's a crisis.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. yea, i guess the gulf of mexico/oil spill is hardly a crisis |
alsame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Lol, I meant a new, breaking crisis. I'm not defending her, I don't |
|
even watch her show anymore. But I've noticed that there are several MSNBC hosts that rarely, if ever, have their hours interrupted by live events, at least for extended coverage.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. that's pretty pathetic for a so-called news channel |
alsame
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. 'So called' is right - they are infotainment. They gave us hours of |
|
Balloon Boy but can't carry this presser.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
6. For the same reason they refused to carry Obama's speech |
|
at the AFL-CIO meeting today. I had to switch to CNN. No good news must be reported (even if we're not sure this is the end of the gulf spill) and no pro-union, pro-worker speeches either.
|
yawnmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
8. good news just doesn't have the drama of bad news... |
|
and where would we be without drama??
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. they choose what we know..... |
yawnmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. If the population, as a whole, weren't so addicted to drama, we would have better news. eom |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. we would have better news if the newsters reported it without editorializing eom |
yawnmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. Is there entertainment value in unbiased reporting??? |
|
Its all about $$ and entertaining the population. and by entertaining, I mean that which induces an emotional response that, in the end, is pleasurable.
|
Xenotime
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-04-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Because corporations own it. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.