Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

38 Senate Republicans vote to filibuster a deficit-reducing jobs bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 02:34 PM
Original message
38 Senate Republicans vote to filibuster a deficit-reducing jobs bill
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/08/04/38-gop-filibuster/

Today, the Senate invoked cloture on a bill that provides states with $26 billion in funding for Medicaid and to prevent mass layoffs of teachers. These two streams of funding have been added to — and then cut from — bill after bill, because conservatives objected to their cost. Initially, the bill that was voted on today added $5 billion to the deficit, but it was tweaked to include larger spending offsets. And according to the Congressional Budget Office, it now decreases the deficit by $1.3 billion over ten years through cuts to food stamps and closing corporate tax loopholes. Two Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) — voted to invoke cloture and end the ongoing filibuster. The rest of the Republican caucus, however, voted no. That’s 38 Republican senators who voted against a deficit reducing jobs bill. (Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) didn’t vote.) The Wonk Room explains how this vote clearly puts the lie to the notion that Republicans really want small spending measure to pass, but only if they’re “paid for.”


38 Republican Senators Vote To Filibuster A Deficit Reducing Jobs Bills
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/04/gop-filibusters-jobs/

(snip)
As David Dayan pointed out, Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) authored a fully paid for state aid bill that was “substantially similar to this,” yet he still voted no. At this point, everyone should stop taking at face value the notion that Republicans really want small spending measure to pass, but only if they’re “paid for.” This vote clearly puts the lie to that assertion.


Roll Call
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00224


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are they cutting food stamps?
Or cutting the need for food stamps by adding jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. DAMN IT! LET THEM ACTUALLY FILIBUSTER ALREADY!!
Why can't this administration let the repukes show everyone what they are really after...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Democrats can't use this against Republicans
That would just be unfair. GOP Senators are just doing a little political posturing. Sure, it's too bad people are suffering, but there are grandstanding points to be made to appeal to the mean, selfish base of the Republican party. So Democrats really can't call the Republicans out on this. It wouldn't be fair! Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why do some poor vote for republicans?
mostly southern poor,could it be that we need more money for education?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC