Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sharron Angle Says Democrats' Agenda Violates 'The First Commandment' - Sam Stein/HuffPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 05:43 PM
Original message
Sharron Angle Says Democrats' Agenda Violates 'The First Commandment' - Sam Stein/HuffPo
Sharron Angle Says Democrats' Agenda Violates 'The First Commandment,' Frames Reid As Dark Overlord
Sam Stein
First Posted: 08- 4-10 03:42 PM | Updated: 08- 4-10 03:53 PM

<snip>

Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle has long seen religious meaning behind her candidacy, going so far as to tell supporters that God was behind her rise from political obscurity, guiding her path to Congress.

On Wednesday, the celestial threads took another turn towards the bizarre, as Nevada political reporter Jon Ralston uncovered an interview in which the Tea Party favorite said that actions of the federal government were a "violation of the First Commandment" -- not amendment, commandment.

"I know people are very frightened about what's going on in this country," Angle said in an interview that originally aired on April 21 with TruNews Christian Radio's Rick Wile. "And these programs that you mentioned -- that Obama has going with Reid and Pelosi pushing them forward -- are all entitlement programs built to make government our God. And that's really what's happening in this country is a violation of the First Commandment. We have become a country entrenched in idolatry, and that idolatry is the dependency upon our government. We're supposed to depend upon God for our protection and our provision and for our daily bread, not for our government. And you've just identified the real crux of the problem."


This statement alone was a rather glaring reflection of just how infused religion is in Angle's political mindset. The Nevada Republican has already made major waves arguing in opposition to abortion even in cases of rape and incest.

But once Ralston published the exchange, things grew even more bizarre. Angle's communications director, Jarrod Agen -- who was hired, it should be noted, less than 24 hours ago -- sent a clarifying statement to the reporter that was dipped even deeper in religious tones, framing Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) as a sort of dark overlord.

"Only the supreme arrogance of Senator Reid would believe that he has a divine right to rule over mere mortals by ramming through Obamacare, billions in reckless spending, and yes, buying cocaine for monkeys," Agen said. "The fact is, Reid has acted like he's all-powerful and accountable to no one. People are frustrated because, like Sharron, they understand Washington has become a giant, unseen, omnipotent force whose presence is felt in all our lives whether we like it or not."

The statement provoked a slew of seemingly shocked tweets from Ralston who took the response as sincere. Only after the fact did the campaign get in touch with him to insist the statement was facetious.

Asked to clarify whether, in fact, he was being sincere or sarcastic, Agen said there was "a little of both in there."

In all, the entire episode seems likely to end up being just another footnote in a Senate candidacy that has been filled with incredible oddities and dramatics. But context remains important. It's not unusual for a candidate to invoke his or her religion in the course of an election. Harry Reid himself has said it's difficult to "separate your religion from your politics, its part of your personality. It is part of who you are."

It's rare, however, for a candidate to insist that their candidacy is imbued with religion itself.


Angle has certainly raised the bar for envelop-pushing statements. Whether those following the campaign will adjust their expectations and coverage as a result (or continue to call a spade a spade) will matter as Election Day approaches.

<snip>

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/04/sharron-angle-says-democr_n_670833.html

:wtf:

:crazy:

:beer:

:smoke:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. bat. shit. insane.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. She's way beyond that
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cocaine for monkeys? I musta missed that one
but then, I miss a lotta stuff.. . ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Perhaps she's thinking of Chimpy McCokespoon.
That woman is totally insane. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. The government isn't supposed to support science.
That's the job of pharmaceutical companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. It wouldn't surprise me, actually.
The effects cocaine has on the human body mean that it might well have medicinal properties, and if so animal experiments would probably be necessary to find that out.

I know nothing whatsoever about this, but "giving cocaine to monkeys" sounds like it might well be a case of genuine and valuable medical research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's a fruitcake.
Edited on Wed Aug-04-10 06:19 PM by LAGC
Can't believe she's polling so close to Reid... I know incumbents aren't real popular right now due to the economy, but damn, if she somehow wins... :shudder:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Crazed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Gee, I can't imagine how Reid surged in the polls
:sarcasm:

While she talks about the first commandment, the first amendment is actually more relevant here.

It not only helps good ideas be heard, it makes sure bad ideas and the idiots who spout them are exposed and debunked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Most Excellent Point !!!
:applause::applause::applause:

:yourock:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Angle wants to eliminate the military and depend on GOD for our protection?
That's gonna go over well with defense contractors.

Cool!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. That lady is really stupid. Pathetic even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sharron Angles' brain violates sanity n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. The first commandment, as I recall, is
"You shall have no other gods before me."

So she's probably correct. I hope that the Democrats' agenda does not include a Christian theocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-04-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well... Sort Of...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC