|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:44 PM Original message |
Math geeks: If the gulf of Mexico were an olympic sized pool, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. A 24oz beer can. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. that much?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. A full beer can. Brand doesn't matter. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I figured more along the lines of 2 or three ounces... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I completely agree that ANY oil in the food chain is too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
36. We still don't know the long-term effects on the Gulf. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. I kinda would like for you to show your work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:19 PM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Not my calculations. I got it from CNBC... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:25 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. oh lord, the M$M? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. I know, I know. My post #1 should have ended with a question mark and not a period. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cirque du So-What (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. And I was gonna ask you to show your work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:28 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. The volume of the Gulf is 2.5x10^15 cubic meters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. I did a back-of-the-envelope calculation yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. That certainly puts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. It's very difficult to wrap one's mind around such large numbers, but consider one thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:58 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Right - people will be swimming all over the gulf beaches |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hootinholler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 04:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
45. No just the Atlantic Bluefin Tuna's breeding grounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 04:35 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. I ate some Australian Bluefin last night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 09:12 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. I'm not a food nazi, but I wish all people would stop eating bluefin for a while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
25. had to laugh at your name in this context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbinacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 12:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
56. LOL. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
39. That doesn't seem to bad then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 04:02 PM Response to Reply #39 |
44. So I guess a few tea spoons of Antrax in your water supply wouldn't seem that bad either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 09:37 AM Response to Reply #44 |
55. Anthrax is not crude oil... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
46. When the parts per billion wash up on your shore, it doesn't matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 09:16 AM Response to Reply #4 |
53. Sounds about right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cleanhippie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 12:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
57. That is only part of the equation.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. So, do we have some 50-mile high pool boys available? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Well..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. If so, let me know, please! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. You'd be disappointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
9. About 0.78 milliliters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Hey, we ended up in the same ballpark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Will you guys do my taxes?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
12. Non - it would all evaporate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. The light weight hydrocarbons would indeed evaporate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:02 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. IIRC, there's plenty of detergent (and dog poop) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. still not buying it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Simple chemistry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:07 PM Response to Reply #22 |
35. Depends who's science you use... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:08 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. People who have said that nature would eventually take care of the problem are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Agreed. I don't want to give Rush any legitimate talking points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. It's also 464 feet of oil on top of a US football field. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Statistical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
20. 1/40th of one ounce (or 0.8 ml). Math nerd math included |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:37 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. You win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
28. For another sense of scale...there are over 4000 oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
37. don't forget, also, the Gulf is not a contained system like a pool |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:42 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Not my point at all. I just wanted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anarch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 03:02 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I have no car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chulanowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. Too bad for your point that it's not evenly distributed through the entire Gulf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 05:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. Well, more importantly for us it's concentrating in the biomass in the gulf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 08:56 AM Response to Reply #38 |
51. What "point"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
40. Your equation is off because it's not the scale of the Gulf, it's the scale of the ecosystems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 02:43 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You're welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 09:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
49. I wasn't snarking you - - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-10-10 09:36 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. No worries, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LearnedHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-09-10 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
50. A friend of mine and I used that exact metaphor early on to guesstimate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC