The passage of a bill to prevent the layoffs of hundreds of thousands of teachers has been dismissed by Republicans as a special interest bill and a bailout:
http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2010/08/10/gop-refuses-to-help-teachers-facing-layoffs/?cxntfid=blogs_cynthia_tucker
The Republican Party is making its loyalties very clear. When it comes to a choice between protecting the little guy and protecting big monied interests, they protect the big monied interests.
Just a little while ago, the House of Representatives passed a bill that will prevent massive teacher layoffs around the country — as well as the layoffs of police officers and firefighters — and also preserve Medicaid benefits for the poor. (The Senate passed it last week.) Teachers and Medicaid have been threatened by state budget shortfalls. Hundreds of thousands of teachers — including some in Georgia — have faced layoffs.
Even though the appropriations are paid for by closing tax loopholes, very few Republicans voted for it. Even though the Congressional Budget Office says the bill will lower the deficit by $1.3 billion over ten years, very few Republicans voted for it. House Minority Whip Mike Pence dismissed it as a tax increase and “one more bailout.”
* * *
Why should giant multinationals be able to claim huge deductions here for money they paid elsewhere? (I should have added earlier that they are able to claim the deductions before the profits are repatriated here. Sometimes, those profits never show up here — so they’ve made out like bandits.) Pence and his Republican colleagues are defending that?
Of course, most Republicans didn’t vote to extend unemployment benefits, either.