if anything at a higher pitch than before.
And the more I think about the whole new "professional left" phrase that they've put out there, the more disgusted I get.
Let's look at the narrow definition of that: the blogs, discussion forums and media.
It's not that long ago that these were few and far between.
I remember how important it was to me to find DU when I was looking for people who felt similarly about the 2004 election.
And during the Bush years, these countering forces to the mainstream rightwing dominated voice grew. Through them we received critical and unreported or underreported information.
And we were able to contribute and counter misinformation. The counter of the FBI's story about Ivins mailing the anthrax is a good example. It was released and pushed, but then taken down in short order because we all worked together to show it was untrue. That was DU'ers, Firedoglake and Greenwald working together. I have no doubt in my mind that would have continued to be a major part of their "evidence" otherwise.
Democracy Now has a great statement on its about page:
http://www.democracynow.org/aboutWHY INDEPENDENT MEDIA ?
For true democracy to work, people need easy access to independent, diverse sources of news and information.
But the last two decades have seen unprecedented corporate media consolidation. The U.S. media was already fairly homogeneous in the early 1980s: some fifty media conglomerates dominated all media outlets, including television, radio, newspapers, magazines, music, publishing and film. In the year 2000, just six corporations dominated the U.S. media.
In addition, corporate media outlets in the U.S. are legally responsible to their shareholders to maximize profits.
And U.S. "public" media outlets accept funding from major corporations, as well as from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which has attempted in the past to exert political and editorial influence on public news producers.
Democracy Now! is funded entirely through contributions from listeners, viewers, and foundations. We do not accept advertisers, corporate underwriting, or government funding. This allows us to maintain our independence.
Repeating: "In the year 2000, just six corporations dominated the U.S. media."
At the same time, newspapers, local and national, have been and continue to cut their staff and their investigative role. The "professional left" filled some of that vacuum and filled it with combinations of incisive and thoroughly documented investigative journalism, thoughtful commentary and even some humor. Through that, people have been able to find information not covered or under-reported in the mainstream media.
Agree or disagree with them, Democracy Now, Huffington Post, Firedoglake, Air America, AmericaBlog, RawStory, etc have changed the dynamic and for the better. And people who found their voices, such as Keith Olbermann, and started using them on cable helped with the shift and helped to make it viable to have a Rachel Maddow added to the lineup.
At first these felt like voices in a strong wind. But over time, they penetrated through the storm, people heard them and rediscovered the strength of their own voices and joined together in countering the propaganda we all felt lashing us. And even though the storm was still and continues to be stronger than these voices, they broke through and they are our modern day muckrakers.
And we shared, and shared and shared that information to others. And people responded.
And that was an important part of voting that cabal out of office.
The same qualities we have been proud of, that of taking digging deeper and pointing out the truth of the matter rather than just repeating talking points is exactly what is being attacked right now. Creating a target as all-encompassing and amorphous as "the professional left" which could be used to include or exclude specific people or entities on any given day provides a flexibility and a bit of cover to the attacks on these invaluable sources.
Muckrakers have never been popular with the powers that be and they clearly still aren't. But they are vital, especially in tough times, to the people which is whom they serve.