|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Dragonbreathp9d (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:15 PM Original message |
Attention Red State LGBT couples: Start getting married! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. It's only in California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
name not needed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. Judge Walker's ruling only applies to California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Not an expert here but why not 9th Circuit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
name not needed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. The case was brought before the District Court for Northern California. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dmallind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. My bad - confused it with another one. Got it thanks. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
racaulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's a Federal ruling, but it only applies to California and Prop 8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Well, if it stands, it will serve as a good precedent everywhere. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zipplewrath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:29 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Technically |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. That's true. It won't happen overnight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unpossibles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. although it only applies to CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erose999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
7. Will red states have to recognize the marriages granted in other states now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-12-10 03:40 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Not yet, unfortunately. That case needs a different SCOTUS, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Jan 05th 2025, 06:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC