A strange twist in the Farhenbach case
dsc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-13-10 12:48 AM
Original message |
A strange twist in the Farhenbach case |
|
I was watching Rachel tonight and she did a follow up/correction on the Farhenbach case. According to her the Sec of the Air Force is denying the case has been referred to him despite the fact that the spokeman confirmed to both her and the NYT that the case had been referred to him. To me there are three options here.
1) the case hasn't been referred which seems very, very unlikely since the spokesman said it had just like Farhenhach's lawyer did.
2) they are lying to stall expelling him (I hope this is the case)
3) they are lying to get him to not file for the injunction or to get the court not to grant it so they can expell him (this had better not be the case).
Either way this is a very strange development.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-13-10 12:53 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They're treating the case like a hot potato. Good. They deserve to get burned.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.