Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you were in the late Roman Empoire, chances are you wouldn't know the end was coming

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:42 PM
Original message
If you were in the late Roman Empoire, chances are you wouldn't know the end was coming
With a whimper rather than a bang....

Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Anakin Skywalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. No? Armageddon is Not a Bang?
One would hardly know from seeing those "end times" books being pimped by the born-agains. Left Behind, whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ha! But sometimes I think if I were a Christian I'd be thinking 'Armageddon' with
all the extreme weather, quakes, wars, bizarre behavior, etc. :7

I agree with the OP. We're clueless as to what's going on and happening to us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. I have fundie neighbors.
They have expressed their "concern" about me in light of the "pending" Rapture.
I asked them if they want me to take care of their car and house and cat when they "go".
Apparently their 6 y/o daughter did not realize Fluffy was staying behind, she got upset.
Now they don't talk to me anymore.
sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. LOL, oh, you are cruel. Poor kid. But nice of you to offer
to take care of the cat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is this one of those trick questions
like who's buried in Grant's tomb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VioletLake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. "History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme." - Mark Twain
Each case is unique. The Soviet Empire fell rather quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Roman empire was in decline for 400 years
before the fall. Those alive during the fall were 20 generations removed from the height of the empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We do everything so much faster these days! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. But did the folks know it?
During those 400 years?

I say they didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'd say moving the capital to Constantinople was a pretty good indication
that the "powers behind the throne" knew well what the dynamics were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not sure if that counts
At that point there were "Two Romes"

After Rome fell, many of the citizens moved to Constantinople

But before then, there was always the hope that Rome was eternal

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well, it IS still there... great food, shitty traffic....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I get your point and I agree
Regardless of how fast or slow it happened, the question is did average citizens realize they were in a dying state, or did they figure the ship would somehow right itself again? I'd say for most of the decline they probably never expected the empire to end, and when it finally did most of the ones alive at that point either didn't notice or didn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
another saigon Donating Member (450 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. yeah well
don't you think nukes accelerate the scenario of empire demise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. This may be the beginning of the end. The economy may never
get better. It may only get slowly and surely worse, as the trade deficit has for the last what, 30 or more years?
America will some day be a third world country and China and India will rule the economy of the world. This is probably an inevitability, something that no one can control.
It's always nice to say pass a law against it or adopt a policy that prevents it, but it won't work.
America's great moment is long gone. There may be large 'last gasps' before the actual, final nose dive.
But maybe not.
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. The economy will surely get "better"... as corporate profits statistically bring up the average.
Eventually, when Americans are willing to work for rupees (45 rupees to the dollar... so a 45X reduction in pay...), then the corporations will be willing to bring jobs back.

If you think about it, it's the inevitable result of globalization... regions of high concentration of wages (the "first world") will "diffuse" that "concentration" to regions of low concentration of wages (the "second" and "third world")... until the system is in a balance. Good for those who previously worked for low wages (as their wages will rise a bit) and very bad for those who previously worked for high wages.

For those who have an inside line on an "executive track" job, it's all roses... the rest of the grubby masses can only hope to start a YouTube and sell it off to the corporate machines... or just toil for subsistence, at best, wages. The age of American Un-Exceptionalism is upon us... embrace a third world standard of living for yourself and your children (some people live quite nicely in the third world, after all).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I know. But that's not really my idea of "better". The executive
jobs are few and far between. And more so in the future.
dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. I didn't mean it as a serious answer regarding "better" either...
I just meant to brace you for the spin that's coming.

When you hear talk that the economy is getting better... my annoying post will make you double check... and we both know that you'll find that it is corporate profits growing, while worker pay and employment levels are stagnating— at best.

I'll also add that, as things get tighter, I suspect that the executive jobs will become increasingly nepotistic in their hiring practices... though I suppose it will probably be 100 or so years before executive positions become completely dynastic/dynastic-inbred (only members of the families of executives hired for executive positions... though Exxon might hire the scion of a Goldman executive family...) — Of course, having a daughter who makes it as a model or actress might be sufficient to get one into the the clique, or one's grandchildren at least... and likewise a son who can marry in. (I can only wonder at the prospects of the mother of some lucky girl who marries Cheney's daughter... at least from the financial perspective... being in the same room with Liz Cheney for more than 10 minutes seems like a sure way to prison for murder, or the morgue for suicide, to me...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Neither China nor India will ever be big global players.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They already are. dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. eh! climate change will trump economic collapse
of course, the pols could always sign a treaty to limit warming to some number of degrees they think is ok. I'm sure that will work out fine, and earth will agree to it and all...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-14-10 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wur Doomed! Wur Doooomed! WUR DOOOOOMED!
Personally, I blame the lead pipes. Or maybe Christianity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brooklyns_Finest Donating Member (747 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. Why
Why do people wish for the demise of America? A world where America is not the preeminent power is a world that I'd rather not live in. The idea that China, India, Russia, or any other alternative will be more benevolent to the world than America is a fallacy.

Interesting enough, people in the "third world" are more likely to wish for America's success than our downfall. If America, the great land of freedom and opportunity fails, what hope is their for anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-15-10 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. Is the inability to use spell-check one of the signs of decline?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC